Browsing Tag: rail

    Документальный фильм – дизель-поезд Д1 / D1 DMU train documentary (with eng subtitles)
    Articles, Blog

    Документальный фильм – дизель-поезд Д1 / D1 DMU train documentary (with eng subtitles)

    November 19, 2019

    This, this is a selfmade toy of a D1 DMU train But this, this is a museum piece D1 DMU train But this is a functional D1 DMU train And this is a decommissioned D1 DMU train As you already understood, this time the movie will be about D1 DMU trains Documentary
    D1 DMU train D1 trains were preceded by 3-car D trains, that were preceded by 6-car DP trains which in turn were preceded by the 3-car DP trains So before we can start to talk about the history of the D1 trains, we have to go back to the year 1940, to the creation of 3-car trains DP Before the Second World War started, railway wagon factory Ganz got another order from Estado railways in Argetine to supply 10 „Rosario“ type motor trains to be used on the railway lines with the gauge of 1000 mm Released in 1940, the trains could not be sent to Argentine due to the outbreak of the Second World War During the war the trains were hidden in a forest to spare them from the air-raids so the trains survived the war without any damage The connection between Ganz factory and the Ministry of Railways started after the war, as Hungary had to pay war reparations to the Soviet Union During the negotiations between Hungary and Soviet Union Hungary offered Soviet Union the same Argentine trains with modification to the gauge 1520 mm Soviet Union took the offer and the trains were modified according to the requirements of Ministry of Railways and were delivered in 1946 These were the 10 three-car trains DP1 to DP10 The three-car diesel train consisted of two head motor carriages and one intermediate trailer car The width of the cars was altogether 2800 mm as the train was built to run on a 1000 mm gauge track This width made it difficult to use the trains on lines with high platforms In the engine compartment of the motor car was located Ganz-Jendrassik diesel engine with the total power of 320 hp Mechanical transmission from the engine to the wheelsets was four-speed Gear and direction changes were done manually using the main controller Acceleration from 0 was up to 0,3 m/s2 Maximum speed of the train was up to 121 km/h Motor cars had from the engine compartment end triaxial bogies, from the intermediate car end two-axle bogies The bogie frames were made out of chrome steel The first and last wheelsets of the triaxial bogies were tractive and 920 mm in diameter the middle wheelset was 760 mm in diameter and was supportive The posts for driving the diesel train were located in the head carriages On the DP trains, the driver’s assistant had a folding chair The driver sat in the middle and the assistant was adjacent A telephone was foreseen for communication between the control posts 3-car DP trains did not have a wall between the engine room and the driver’s cab and the driver sat basically on the engine cover In one of the head car of the trainset was the drivers cab, the engine room, room for mail, buffet with a kitchen, a toilet and a passenger salon with 44 seats In the other head car in addition to the driver’s cab and engine compartment, was a luggage compartment, four six-seated coupes, and a toilet In the trailer car were two passenger salons one for 40 passengers, the other for 48 The total number of seats in the train was 156 In the trailer cars of trains DP-4, DP-6 and DP-7, instead of the passenger cabin with 48 seats, there were five six-seat coupes Total number of seats in these three trains was 138 All the trains had bolstered passenger seats All the cars were equipped with water heating and air conditioning The climate control system also included a cooling system of the drinking water The cars were coupled with Ganz system couplers In case of necessity, SA-3 automatic couplers were installed In the Soviet Union, these 10 trains initially serviced the lines along the coast of the Black Sea in the Crimea and the Caucasus Later, in 1949, they were given to Vilnius-diesel depot and started to service several intercity lines, including the line Vilnius-Riga-Tallinn At some point, one DP train was remade in Vilnius into a commuter train The head of the depot consulted the factory about the train suspension as the weight of the train changed The diesel trains „Rosario“ were decommissioned in 1964 after the start of series production of commuter diesel trains D1 and after giving them into service Today, none of the 3-car DP trains have preserved Before the D diesel trains there were diesel trains DP01 to DP08 with electrical transmission They were the next demand of the Ministry of Railways so 6-car trains with a higher level of comfort were built for the Moscow-Leningrad line After the 3-car DP trains, the factory got another order from the Soviet Union in 1948 The order foresaw a supply of diesel trains that had to be fast, economical and comfortable for travelling At first, MashinoImport ordered 20 trains, but 8 were built Ganz factory chose a 600 hp diesel engine and electrical transmission as the driving unit for the 6-car diesel train Development of a new type of diesel train put the designers and workers of the factory in front a new great task: For the first time the factory used electrical transmission on diesel trains For the first time the factory had to create a train with such high capacity And again for the first time the factory had to create a diesel train consisting of six cars From 1949 to 1952, 8 „Hargita“-based trains were built for the Soviet Union and they got the designation DP01 – 08 Zero became the sign for distinguishing the six-car trains from the three-car trains, which had a similar designation The trains consisted of two head motor cars and 4 intermediate trailer cars The streamlined frontal parts of the head carriages visually resembled the three-car DP trains that arrived in the Soviet Union in 1946 The width of the 6-car diesel train cars was increased to 3010 mm The first 4 six-car DP trains differed from the rest They were sent for testing in the Soviet Union and after that the height of the train’s car body was increased the roof was cut off and the car walls were hightened Also the layout of the cars was changed Two Ganz-Jendrassik diesel engines were placed in the engine compartment of the motor car: a 16-cylinder main diesel engine with 600 hp for the traction generator and a 6-cylinder auxiliary diesel engine with the capacity of 220 hp for powering the auxiliary machines The diesel engines had a similar design to the three-car DP diesel trains Many parts were interchangeable And also on the six-car DP train, the motor bogie was triaxial First wheelset from the front end was supportive and the second and third were tractive and driven by electric traction motors A traction motor had the capacity of 180 kW which enabled the train to reach speeds of up to 104 km/h with the acceleration of 0,4 m/s2 All the wheels had the diameter of 1050 mm The drivers’ cabs were located in the head cars The set of gauges, located on the console was the same as in a three-car DP train, but their placement had undergone significant changes Locomotive crew consisted of a driver and two assistants, who were located in the rear car In the head cars of the train behind the driver’s cab were located the engine room, baggage compartment, 4 passenger compartments and a service compartment In three middle cars were 9 four-place and 1 two-place passenger compartments and a compartment for conductors In the fourth middle car were located a kitchen and a restaurant for 12 people, 5 four-place, 1 two-place compartments for passengers and a four-place service compartment In all the cars were toilets, boilers for heating and climate control systems with automatic operation For the night, the passengers were provided with beds with linen Total number or places for passengers in the train was 164, for crew 14 The salon walls were covered with polished walnut plywood The walls in the kitchen, engine room and in the driver’s cab were paneled with aluminium sheets The berths in the compartments were soft springed Trains differed with high comfort and gained popularity among the passengers On the 28th June, 1950, the 6-car diesel train DP-01 departed from the Moscow-Leningrad station for a test run The track from Moscow to Leningrad was covered in 7,5 hours with an average speed of 93 km/h After the tests all the 6-car DP diesel trains were assigned to Pererva depot and started to run between Moscow and Leningrad At first, the trains were painted in a standard livery for flagship trains for that time – a dark blue colour In 1956 the trains were repainted green in the same pattern In 1957 the trains were painted in the scheme of bottom red – creamy-yellow top as was a standard for flagship trains In 1958 the trains were transferred to Leningrad-Warsawsky depot and started to service the Leningrad-Tallinn line Later, some of the trains were given to Vilnius-diesel depot, where they started to work on a number of intercity lines, including Vilnius-Riga-Tallinn Most of the 6-car diesel trains stopped their service in 1961 In 1969 4 cars of DP-06 were transferred from Riga to Shchekino loading and transport management for organizing local traffic on the departmental branch The train worked under the Industrial transport office until the beginning of the 1980s, after that it was taken out of service and lifted from the bogies Until 2010 one of the head cars was used as an outhouse in Shchyokino station, after that it was scrapped for metal One middle car of the 6-car DP diesel train was used as stationmanager’s building and as a locomotive crew break room at Ruijena station, but the car was scrapped approximately in 2006 In the Budapest railway museum one Hargita-type diesel train, that was built in 1944 is preserved This specific train was a 3-car one and it serviced the head of Hungarian railways The grilles in front of the windows were not for protection from apes, as many people thought, but from birds Since the second half of the 1950’s on the Soviet Union railway steam locomotive traction became superseded by diesel and electric At the same time multiple unit trains began to receive increasing popularity in the field of passenger traffic Soviet Railways decided that in the areas of large cities on non-electrified railway lines the passenger traffic on short lines will be carried out with the help of diesel trains By that time, the production of similar electric multiple unit trains had already been launced at the Riga Wagon Factory, but there was no experience among the Soviet designers for creating multiple unit trains with diesel engines Therefore, the order for the design of suburban and local traffic diesel trains was transferred to the Hungarian factory Ganz-Mavag that had built the DP diesel trains for the Soviet Union before In the end of 1960, the first D diesel multiple unit train was created which was dark green at the bottom and light green at the top It was with the number 021, because according to the numbering, the first 10 were the DP Rosario trains, then different reparation trains from Germany and with the number 021 was the 3-car diesel train D Train consisted of two motor cars and one trailer car between them The first train, had a slightly different front view as it did not have a pilot In December 1960, before transferring the train to the Soviet Union, the train was tested on the 1435mm gauge track As a result, it was found that the train accelerated 9 km from 0 to 120 km/h and it took 6 minutes and 26 seconds In December 1960 the D 021 was given over to the Soviet Union in Zahony In February 1961, the train was sent under the orders of the Ministry of Railways to the Baltic railway, to Riga, depot Zasulauks where they had experience with Ganz-Mavag locomotives, class VME1 The train was also tested on the test track in Shcherbinka where the maximum speed of 128,7 km/h was reached During the testing, attention was paid to the acceleration, braking and to the overall dynamics of the train The acceleration of the train was 0,4 m/s2 After the tests, the train was sent back to Riga from where it was later transferred to Vilnius The motor cars had a Ganz-Jendrassik engine with 500 hp and a five-speed mechanical transmission Gear change was automatical During the design, working temperature range from +35 C to -40 C was considered Train length was 73,6 m, constructional speed 120 km/h During the building process, some changes were made to the train construction Diesel train D 021 differed from others externally – passenger compartment windows were with air vents, as well as in other details – placement of the gauges on the drivers console, coal-fired heating boiler and it did not have a button for shunting under the driver’s side window The trains 024, 025, 026, 027, 030, 032 were fitted with semi-soft seats in the passenger salons And starting from the train no. 080, upper white lights were installed to the front of the train, accordingly to the signalling instructions during that time In 1963 more capacious production to fulfil the orders from Ministry of Railways was started Besides the 45 three-car diesel trains, also 5 four-car trains were ordered About them a bit later Considering export and production for Hungary, Ganz-Mavag did not have enough factory capacity to fulfill the orders As a result it was decided that the trailer cars will be built in Pieck Machinebuilding factory, in Györ, and it lasted for almost 20 years From 1960 until 1964 Ganz-Mavag delivered 89 three-car diesel trains to the Soviet Railways The last train was with the number 109 One of the main drawbacks of the 3-car D trains was small capacity and low acceleration, not allowing the trains to operate on the suburban lines with sufficient speeds As of January 1, 1976 86 D diesel trains were operational on the Soviet Railways, the rest were damaged in accidents and crashes As the film is about the D1 diesel trains, we asked from a train driver in Chisinau depot, Vladimir Strelets, how the 3-car trains differed from the 4-car D1 trains The bodies did not differ, but the transmission was 5-speed mechanical, abruptly changed gears Here is the first gear hydraulic, smoothly changes Over time, the D diesel-trains were replaced on the main lines by the D1 trains This largely explains their rather fast „retirement“ According to some sources, the D trains worked until the year 1987, according to other sources, the last trains worked on October and Odessa railways even until the year 1991 The last working motor car was D 025-3, which was rebuilt into a railcar for inspectional runs on Odessa railway approximately in the beginning of 1980s In 1993 the car was no longer in use and was left standing in the Odessa-Freight depot The car was scrapped for metal in approximately 2003 in Hristinovka depot Today, in 2016, some of the cars of D trains are still remaining Motor car from 031 in Tbilisi and some trailer cars And now, after the 3- and 6-car DP trains and the 3-car D train we have reached the 4-car D1 train The Soviet Railways were fully satisfied with the operating results of the 3-car D diesel trains, but requested to increase the passenger capacity In 1961, the factory developed draft versions of 4-car diesel trains Factory assured that the diesel engine of the 3-car train will also manage with the fourth car but the Ministry of Railways demanded a more powerful engine The factory fulfilled the order and the 4-car train was fitted with a 730hp engine and a hydromechanical transmission As always, Ganz-Mavag offered different train designs but the familiar design of the D train was chosen Diesel train D1 consists of 2 head motor cars and two trailer cars in the middle Operating with 4 trailer cars or as a double unit train was foreseen The first 4-car diesel train D 201 was tested on 1435 mm gauge in July 1963 Technical parameters were examined for 3 weeks Maximum speed of 126,7 km/h was reached Despite the fact that the last 3-car D train was numbered 109, the first D1 got the number 201 It’s because it was a new train series and it was decided to start from the next hundred In addition, the first 4-car trains were built in parallel with the three-car trains and as it was not known how many 3-car trains will be built it was impossible to continue with the numbering In September 1964, the second train D-202 was tested in Shcherbinka According to the technician, who was overseeing the tests, the tests were carried out in a formation, where half of the train was the D-202 and the other half was from DR1 This combination, of course, was never used in service The width of the car body is 3076 mm Weight of the motor car is 68,5 tons, but the trailer cars 36,5 tons Total train weight was 210 tons and the axle load to the track 17 tons Maximum service speed of the train is 120 km/h The design of cars, bogies and arrangement of the four-car diesel trains was identical to the three-car D diesel trains All the passenger passages are equipped with automatic double doors with electro-pneumatic control from the driver’s cab Entering through the first passage, you can enter the passenger salon or the engine room, where the passengers of course, had no entry So, for now let’s proceed further into the salon The main passenger salon area is occupied by 2- and 3-seater sofas, located on the either side of the central aisle In the passenger salons there were a total of 410 wooden seats Factory offered soft seats to the Ministry of Railways, already during the production of three-car D trains but the offer was rejected because of possible vandalism and the wooden seats were installed instead At the end of the passenger compartment of the motor car is located a toilet and the second passage Originally, in the toilet was an enamelled vany steel toilet with water, a holder for the toilet paper, enamelled steel sink with tap for water and a cabinet for clean and a bin for used towels As you can see, there is nothing left of that The cars had SA-3 automatic couplers and between the cars were friction shock absorbers and a passage that enabled to go from one car to the other In the upper part of the friction absorber were three shafts for ventilation and heating Passenger salon ventilation was ensured by discharge ventilation equipment Through the two outermost air shafts the air was blown into the salon, and the middle one functioned as a shaft for air extraction Heating the air in wintertime was done by the diesel engine cooling water A fan was placed in the motor cars for blowing and venting the air into the passenger salons The air got to the trailer cars through the air shafts located in the roofs of cars, which were conneted with the shafts of the neighboring cars A liquid fuel powered automatic boiler was located in the motor car for heating the water in case of the engine not working In the trailer cars, most of the interior space has been reserved for the passenger salon, on either side of which are located passages The salons had two kinds of lamps The trains from the no. 226 until 541, the lighting of the salons was by fluorescent lamps, but on the rest of the trains the lightning was with incandescent lamps with oval shades Passenger salons in the diesel trains were equipped with loud speakers for the passengers’ information In the motor cars between the engine room and the first passage was a small compartment, that was first used for storing baggage It had 5 folding seats and without luggage it was used to accommodate passengers From the train number 306, the luggage compartment was eliminated and it was used to accommodate the air ventilation filters and radio equipment of the train Moving on towards the driver’s cabin, through the luggage compartment, we find ourselves in the engine room, where the HVC is also located On the side of which is located the main switch, different breakers and fuses, ammeters and voltmeters In the HVC are various contactors, relays and contacts, to which bridges are placed in case of failure of various systems The drivers who worked on the D1 trains, even today, after 20 years remember the contacts, where the bridges had to be placed Train driver Andrus Roosma, how long did You work on the D1 DMU trains? I worked on the D1 DMU trains since 1974 as a driver’s assistant 2 years and since 1979 as a driver for 8 years until 1987 After that the DMU train stock in Tallinn-Väike depot was replaced with DR1A trains and the Hungarian trains were left only in Tartu depot Later, when Tartu depot was closed, the Hungarian trains were given back to us for a brief period of time and I worked on them for a couple of months in 2001 So 15 years have passed since I last drove them But I can say that I learned the D1 trains with that time period so thoroughly that I can remember everything, I can start the engine without any problems, place bridges to the necessary contacts, for example contacts 119 and 130 for the selection circuit The location of the contacts I can remember to this day, I could enter the HVC even in the dark, just turn to the left and can place the bridge In the engine room is installed a V-shaped 12-cylinder, four-stroke, pre-chamber diesel engine Ganz-Jendrassik with idle revolutions of 530 rpm, which develops 730 hp at revolutions 1250 rpm Engine is started using a starter and is equipped with a turbocharger with intercooling of the charge air The D1 trains had the same engine type that the D trains The only difference was in a turbocharger on D1 trains First D train diesel engine was built in 1957 and was originally for Egyptian railway, but later it was used also on the D and D1 trains It was a standard engine for Ganz-Mavag and it was used only on railway rolling stock The cooling system is installed on the roof of a motor car above the diesel engine The transmission of the D1 diesel train is hydromechanical and it has three gears: the first is hydraulical, second and third are mechanical Also the D1 trains have automatic gear change Change from the first speed to the second occurred at the speed of 55,6 km/h and from second to third at speed 83,5 km/h As the second speed is mechanical, it was possible to start the engine from a pull start Due to the lack of spare parts in Moldova, before and now, the starter is only in one motor car and the second one is started with pulling at second speed There were situations, and not only in Moldova, where both engines stalled during the trip and with the help of passengers, engines were started with a push start During service, the lack of reliability and breakage of the third speed drives in the transmission was revealed In order to reduce damage to the equipment, the pipes of the third speed drives were closed, limiting the maximum speed to 85 km/h As it is currently in Moldova, but as the line speeds do not exceed 80 km/h, there is nothing to worry about On the D, D1 and all the Hungarian DP trains, the engine and the transmission are placed on the first, triaxial tractive bogie Factory Ganz placed the engine and the transmission on the bogie already in 1934 The idea was that along with the engine and the transmission all the auxiliary systems would also be placed on the bogie In such case, when there is damage to the car body, the body can be lifted from the bogies and replaced with a new or an overhauled old one and the train could carry on working But over time, the power and along with that the dimentions of the engine grew and the auxiliary systems no longer fit the bogie and were placed on an additional frame, under the car body Despite that, the factory left the engine with the transmission on the bogie, under a cover Placement of the engine under a cover is also good because the noise level in the engine room is similar to the noise level in the driver’s cab of a DR1A DMU train The auxiliary machinery of the motor cars charging generator, air compressor and the generator for the cooling fan with an electric drive were mounted as mentioned before, on an auxiliary frame suspended from the motor car frame on which is also the reductor of auxiliary machines driven directly by the diesel engine via the main shaft of the hydromechanical transmission The D and first 175 D1 trains had identical bogies The motor bogie of the D train was constructed specially for this series The principle was the same as on the DP series trains, but the bogie was new Motor bogies were produced with axial formula 1-0-1 The middle running axle was designed as a bent fixed axis with freely rotating running wheels mounted on bearings The peculiarity of the solution lies in the fact, that in order to pass on the curves as the axis and also the free running wheels were able to move laterally In 1969, from the train no. 376 the motor bogies had a new design Previously issued motor bogies had bent axles, bearings of which began to fail Due to that, the new plant designed a new bogie with the formula 0-2 In other words, the tractive and running axes switched places and as a result, the bogie was lengthened Supporting bogie of the motor car and bogies of the trailer cars are two-axle All the wheelsets have double-sided braking, with the exception of the supporting axis of a triaxial bogie of the motor car All the train wheels had a tread diameter of 950 mm without any wear But lets go to the cab In the driver’s cab there are the driver’s seat, mounted on the wall and a folding chair for the assistant Besides the driver’s seat originally there were two round hight-adjustable seats for the assistants On the right of the lowerable driver’s window on the wall between the driver’s cabin and the engine room is a button with which the driver can operate the train during shunting when he has to look backwards through the window and is not able to hold the throttle To the right of the driver is EPK-150, brake valve, whistle/horn valve and pressure gauges Above them is a block of fault indicator lights From the factory was foreseen a pedal for the horn in front of the driver, but for the whistle a handle on the right wall Later, the controlling of the horn was also tranferred to the handle Handle towards yourself whistle, away from yourself horn In front of the driver is the main control panel that consisted of two parts a horizontal part, consisting of buttons and switches for the control systems and various auxiliary circuits, and an inclined part containing the gauges and warning lights To the left of the console is the radio and the throttle There was also a microphone for passenger information The throttle has two handles main one with positions 0, A, B, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 and a reverser for selecting the direction of movement When set to “0” all the controlling apparatus are switched off and the handle can be removed Because it is made of non-ferrous metal, it has been stolen on many of the trains and replaced with a homemade one In the position “A” the diesel engine is started and reversing can be done In the position “B” crankshaft speed increases from 530 rpm to 830 rpm In the positions from 1 to 5 the traction mode is switched on and crank shaft speed is sequentially increased Unlike the rest of the rolling stock, the speedometer 3SL-2M was locked on the D and D1 trains on the left side of the driver in the assistant’s corner For the driver there was a separate electrical spedometer in the middle of the control panel I wonder, how does servicing the train look like from the driver’s cab? Beautiful! György Villanyi was a test driver of Ganz-Mavag factory and an engineer on the first D1 diesel trains in the Vilnius depot, and we asked him if there were any problems and errors with the trains Also there was a problem when two trains were coupled together, the doors worked diagonally Meaning that the first train opened the left the doors but the second train opened the right ones When coupled together, there was also a problem with the reversor one train pulled to one direction and the other train to the other Adjustments were done to the electrical circuit on location But what do the drivers say? Did the trains have any typical malfunctions Of course there were many malfunctions Mostly with the transmission and gears Because the disks broke constantly Diesel engines worked more or less reliably, everything was new Train driver Roosma, You were the senior driver on the train D1-616 Which were the typical malfunctions on Your train, if there were any? Yes, I was the senior driver on D1-616 And I remeber well when we got it from the factory, it was brand new And I can say that it had no big technical problems Of course, there were some small errors, but they were not actually problems, they were nuances Problems started when our train went for repairs to Vilnius or for an overhaul to Velikiye-Luki There the engines and the transmissions were changed Even though they were repaired, they were old and then the problems started But as long as the trains were new, on our trains, I can say that there were practically no problems Problems started after bigger repairs On the first year, in 1964, 15 trains were released from the factory From 1965 to 1968 40 trains were released every year Record-breaking was the year 1969 when 45 trains were released from the factory Later production decreased, remaining at an average of 20 trains per year It took on average 2-3 months to build one train During the production, were there any changes made? Small changes were made, altogether around 35 Alongside small electrical and technical changes, the placement of the front lights was changed twice and added an additional tail light, the location of the ventilation air intake was changed, salon lights were changed and so on For example until the train no. 335 sand bunkers were on the motor bogies, but from no. 336, they were moved to the car body Since 1986, the engine power increased to 800 hp due to the modification of the combustion chambers and pistons The smallest change was from the train no. 296 The first 4-car trains had the designation D on the front label, not D1 In 1967, from the train No. 296 they got the designation D1 But why did that happen? The label on the head car got the additional „1“ and instead of „D“ became „D1“ But in the wagons it stayed as before, just „D“ If the first D1 trains were externally the same as D, dark green at the bottom and light green on top, then in 1967, since the train no. 306 the livery was changed and the trains became red-creamy color They stayed like this for nearly 20 years of production The livery was changed purely because of aesthetic reasons the green color was military, but red-creamy was more pleasant to the eye It is worth noting, that from 1976 to 1979, the D1 diesel trains were built as six-car trains According to some sources it was from no. 581 to 650, according to other sources to no. 660 The maximum speed of six-car trains was 80 km/h Most of the additional cars were used in other, earlier trains as replacement of damaged cars Some of these additional cars never worked on the lines For example in Estonia, the trains no. 588, 589, and 616 arrived as six-car ones The extra cars of trains 588 and 589 never went into service, and they were vandalized in Tallinn-Väike station and later sent for scrap metal For the first 6 trains, the trailer cars were also built in Ganz-Mavag factory in Budapest, but from 1963 the middle cars started to be built in Györ from there they were sent to Ganz-Mavag were they were given the last coating of paint and then sent to Zahony where they were handed over to the Ministry of Railways About Zahony, a bit later The middle cars were built in Györ until 1980 and train No. 660 was the last with trailer cars from Györ But why was the production of middle cars stopped in Györ? And in 1982, the middle cars were still built in Ganz-Mavag in Budapest as the factory in Arad was still not ready for production of the cars In the summer of 1983, the production was launched, but there were still no cars as factory production lagged behind the desired plans In their own defense, they told that they were building the cars for the first time and that is why there was a delay By the end of July, 14 motor cars were in Zahony, but not a single trailer car In agreement with the Ministry of Railways, only the motor cars were handed over and trailer cars were promised a bit later Instead of the not ready trailer cars, the additional trailer cars from the 6-car trains were used In Estonia, for example, were the motor cars of train no. 692 but the trailer cars were from train no. 616, cars no. 6 and 8 While all that is left of the factory in Györ in the year 2016 is a bare field, the street name of „Wagon building“ and a monument near the supermarket, the factory in Arad operates successfully and produces freight wagons Handing over all the cars of D and D1 trains took place at the Ganz-Mavag territory in Zahony The consist was taken to Zahony on 1435 mm track and the supporting truck had narrower wheelsets but the motor bogies were temporary for transporting From the factory, the trains had SA-3 automatic couplers and for transporting on the 1435 mm track adapter-wagons were used This kind of a wagons had a SA-3 coupler at one end and on the other end there was a screw coupler After changing the bogies in Zahony, the train was tested on 1524 mm gauge track between Tuszer and Komoro stations But the line was with speed restrictions and it disturbed the regular traffic Later, a new marshalling yard was built at Eperješke and a line to Tornyospálca, that was built for reloading for the military needs It was built for the speed of 120 km/h and the tests started to be carried out there After the testing, the trains were handed over to the Ministry of Railways There were speculations that the Soviet Union did not pay for all the trains but offered cheap oil and fuel in exchange We asked about the correctness of this information from the factory veterans The first D1 trains were sent to Vilnius depot, which was at that time the base for the development of a new series of diesel trains and an advanced repair facility, the first on the railway network that mastered the maintenance of the components and assemblies of the D1 trains Diesel trains were sent from the factory to the Moscow railway, to the October railway, to the Gorky railway, to the South-Eastern railway, to the Baltic railway, to the Lvov railway, to the Odessa railway, to the Moldovan railway and to the Donetsk railway and they ensured local passenger services on different lines The trains were operated as in 4-car and as in 8-car formations 10-car trains, meaning 4+6 cars, operated only on the line Odessa-Chisinau In some regions of Ukraine the diesel trains had special boxes, in which bread was transported to the near-station shops And in the Volyn region a wagon shop cruised, converted from the trailer car no. 448-2 In total, about 110 D1 trains worked on the Baltic railway In Estonia, the diesel trains were assigned to Tallinn-Väike and Tartu depots, In Lithuania, they were in Vilnius and in Radviliškis There were no D1 trains in Latvia, DR1 trains were used there, made by Riga Wagon Factory In Estonia, the traffic on the previously narrow gauge lines, rebuilt to the broad gauge, were opened by D1 trains These were the lines Tallinn-Rapla, Tallinn-Pärnu, Tallinn-Türi and Tallinn-Viljandi To the Tallinn-Väike depot was assigned D1-268, which has an interesting history it was damaged during testing on the military railway in Záhony As the factory veteran-engineer György Villanyi explained There was a series of mistakes There was no authorization to run but also there was nobody to tell not to run Some freight wagons were left on the track that were used for tests Nothing was said to the driver about them So the driver drove the train as he was used to And all of a sudden there were freight wagons on the track and a collision happened Motor car D1-268-1 was badly damaged and it was sent back to the factory for repairs The factory restored the car, the cost of repairs was 15 000 rubles, that would be 100 000 dollars today The train itself cost 311 000 rubles back then that today would be 2,5 million dollars So the restoration cost nearly 5% of the price of the train The last assigned D1 train in Tallinn-Väike depot was in the Soviet times and it was a mixed train with one motor car from no. 256 and the other from no. 367 In total 33 different D1 trains worked in Estonia, and in Lithuania – 70 By the end of the Soviet era the trains worked in Estonia in Tartu depot, in Lithuania in Vilnius and Radviliškis depots, also in Russia, in Kaliningrad The Donetsk railway received about 90 D1 trains and they were assigned to Ilovaisk, Debaltsevo-Passenger, Popasnaya and Svatovo depot About 60 trains arrived to the Odessa railway, to Odessa, Hristinovka, Nikolayev and Taras Shevchenko depot Among those trains was also D1-435, that worked in Nikolayev Alumina Plant The Lvov railway got about 75 trains and they worked in Korolevo, Kolomyja, Ternopol and Zdolbunov depot Around 80 trains arrived to the Moscow railway and they worked in Vyazma, Smolensk, Uzlovaya, Kaluga, and in Lgov depot The October railway got around 60 D1 trains and they worked in Leningrad-Moscow-Sorting, Leningrad-Finland, Vyborg, Novgorod, Murmansk, and in Rzhev depot The Gorky railway received about 45 trains, and there the trains worked there in Kazan and Gorky-Moscow depot Trains D1 also worked on the South-Eastern railway in Yelec, Tambov and Otrozhka depot, about 35 trains in total We asked from a veteran-train driver Vladimir Strelets, when did the first Hungarian trains arrive to the Moldovan railway, to Chisinau depot? When the first trains came to Chisinau, I was still a little boy I remember, my father worked as a train driver and around 1963 he took me with him on the trips It was around 1963 The 3-car D trains also worked in Moldova But which trains serviced passengers before the D and D1 trains? Before serviced old passenger cars with diesel locomotives and steam locomotives It was… When the diesel trains came, it was like a new era in transportation New, comfortable, modern… In total, during the whole time in Moldova, 70 different D1 trains have worked in Chisinau depot There were very few depots that made major repairs for diesel trains in capacity of TR-2 and TR-3 and that had specialized workshops, altogether only 9, including: Vilnius-diesel, Uzlovaya, Chisinau and Hristinovka In Hristinovka depot, one CME3 locomotive was rebuilt for the power tests of the D1 train engines As mentioned, Chisinau depot was one of the major repair depots Veteran driver Vladimir Strelets and senior master Vladimir Chui reminisce the old times There was a very good repair base and good, competent repairmen in Chisinau depot And thanks to that, there were constant improvements and modifications made Also the trains from Ukraine came here for repairs Innovative methods were always used in the repair process In the old times… In the old times we made 4 repairs in a month These were the times Currently there is a deficit with the spare parts, with workforce Workers are leaving, there are no younger people coming But the biggest problem are the spare parts We used to carry out the repairs TO-2, TO-3, TR-1, in the old times a bigger capacity repair TR-2 was also done We even did TR-3 repairs in the 1990’s on our own after the Soviet Union But was it convenient for the maintenance crew to work on the D1 trains? Of course it was convenient, with all the mechanizations But now there is very little left of that During the service, at least 18 motor cars of the diesel trains were converted into railcars for inspection runs and for transporting track crew A veteran driver from Chisinau depot, Vladimir Strelets reminisces the conversion of the trains into railcars First one was made in the 1970’s, it was a 3-car train It was made for the Head of the Railway, the Odessa-Chisinau railway was back then Last ones were made, of decommissioned trains, 6 cars, for the depot, for the track workers and one, a beautiful one, for the Railway Board Vladimir Pavlovich can tell you when exactly, because he was involved with them When did the railcars start to be converted? – Which ones? The first one we made was 260, yes? No, the first one we made was 033, a 3-car train Oh, yes
    – It was the Odessa-Chisinau railway back then What year? Seventy… 1975 or something like that But later no. 260 and then the 600’s These we made for the track department And the last one we made in 2002 As of 1st of January 1992 there were 472 D1 diesel trains on the railways of the ex Soviet Union At this point many of the decommissioned cars had either burned or been damaged in collisions For example, motor car 580-3 in Estonia got damaged in a collision with a panel truck The crew was not injured but the motor car was decommissioned and was used as a warehouse until the year 2005 After the collapse of the Soviet Union the situation with the repairs of the diesel trains deteriorated, as the only company overhauling the diesel trains Velikiye Luki Locomotive Repair Plant, was in Russia, but most of the diesel trains D1 were abroad As the spare parts were expensive and getting them was not easy, different railways and depots were looking for a solution for the situation We asked from a driver from Chisinau depot about this This is an interesting question Of course when there were no spare parts, something started to be made… They were looking for options where to get everything from, where to buy and with what money Something was done with our own efforts, some things improved, the repair intervals were extended And to this day we are operational The upgrading and modernizing was also done in local depots as much as it was achievable We asked whether there were any improvements made in the Chisinau depot? For example, on these trains we made the synchronization of the gear change ourself It had never been done anywhere else before Later we did a lot with the gearboxes, increased the reversor performance We modified a lot In Russia, in mid-1990s, due to lack of funding and the termination of spare part supply from Hungary, the diesel rolling stock repair department proposed to replace the power unit of the D1 diesel trains for a domestic one Design and manufacturing of the hydraulic transmission was entrusted to Kaluga machine building plant, but the diesel engine – to the “Zvezda” factory In 1995 at Velikiye Luki Locomotive Repair Plant, The first diesel train, D1-728 was modernized The modernization proceeded with considerable difficulties The hydrodynamic transmission of the Kaluga factory was not unified sufficiently with the motor bogie of diesel train and therefore did not quite fit to its geometry and there were also other problems In the future, by the decision of the Moscow railway, several more D1 trains were modernized in Velikiye-Luki plant After modernization, the diesel trains got the designation D1M Modernized trains got contradicting evaluations Along with the higher capacity of the diesel engine, there was a poor quality of components and assembly, greater complexity of servicing the diesel engine M773A in comparison with the original one, low reliability of the hydraulic transmission, problems with air intake for the engine and etc Following the Moscow Railway, several trains of the October and South-Eastern Railways were modernized, 16 trains in total As of 2012 out of the 16 trains only two were preserved and the rest were decommissioned With the collapse of the Soviet Union, the Baltic railway also collapsed After the Soviet Union, 12 D1 trains were left in Estonia, in 1995 in Lithuania there were 47 D1 diesel trains left, in Kaliningrad there were about 25 trains left All the 12 Estonian D1 trains were assigned to Tartu depot By the year 2001, 4 trains were left 588, 654, 692 and 801 After terminating the passenger traffic in Tartu region in March 2001, the trains were sent to Tallinn-Väike depot where, thanks to the efforts of the drivers, trains 588 and 692 serviced the lines several times in the summer of 2001 By the year 2002 all four trains were withdrawn from service and in 2004 they were sold to Ukraine, to Zhmerynka wagon repair factory There are no D1 trains left in Estonia D1-264 which was in working order was offered to the Haapsalu railway museum, but they refused due to their own stupidity An old train driver from Tallinn-Väike depot, Andrus Roosma, reminisces the D1 trains If to reminisce unpleasant or pleasant situations, then from the unpleasant ones I recall when I received a D1 train from repairs in Vilnius After the test run, everything, the engine was working normally and we started our trip to Tallinn Everything was accepted, all was working well, even excellent Drove through Latvia to Estonia In Estonia is a town called Tartu There we were coupled together with a scheduled train So we would not be let through in reserve And we continued our trip to Tallinn On the way, at first the rear gearbox of our train got jammed and we had to switch it off and place it into neutral And some stations further, at Raasiku station, a piston from the other engine broke loose, and all the cooling water and oil was discharged and that motor car was also out of service Our train was taken to Tallinn by the scheduled train and pushed us to the Tallinn-Väike depot The Chief of the Depot of course yelled at me a lot, why did I bring some scrap metal from Vilnius and not a repaired diesel train And this was a very unpleasant moment that I still remeber I was yelled at a lot, but nothing can be done, those were the times As said, in Lithuania 47 D1 trains were left after the Soviet Union In the middle of the 1990’s all the old gearboxes were changed to new ones, produced by Ganz-David-Brown The new gearboxes fit precisely onto the mounts of the old gearboxes In the beginning of the 2000’s, the salons of the trains were modernized new plastic seats were fitted but old wooden chairs were also sheathed with soft upholstery 11 withdrawn trains, including old Estonian ones, were stored since 2002 or 2003 in several different reserve bases Most of them were scrapped for metal in 2008 Until the end of 2008, a trailer car 385-4 was used in Radviliškis station for transporting station workers In Lithuania all the D1 trains were withdrawn from service in April-May of 2011 The last working train was a mix of no. 693 and 767 Already in 1985 one motor car was placed as a monument at the entrance to the railway pioneer camp in Ignalina It was D1-210-3 It stood there until the mid-2000’s, when it was scrapped for metal In Lithuania, D1-593 has been preserved and it is standing as a 3-car set in Vilnius railway museum On the Kaliningrad railway, the D1 trains ended their service in 2010 On the Moscow railway – in 2014, On the Gorky railway around 1999 and on the October railway around 2003 Around the year 2010 the D1 trains were no longer used for transporting the workers of track maintenance station on the October Railway On the South-Eastern Railway the D1’s haven’t been used since 2008 In Russia, the D1 trains have been preserved in the railway museums of Yekaterinburg, Kaliningrad, St.Petersburg and Moscow Like in Lithuania, also in Ukraine all the old gearboxes were changed As of March 2016, the D1 trains are operated in Ukraine in limited quantity in Korolevo, Kolomya, Zdolbunov, Hristinovka, Svatovo, Rodakovo and Ilovaysk depot Trains from Kolomya depot service also the line to Rahiv, in the beautiful Carpathian mountains In total, about 35 trains are in service In 2012, by the order of the Moldovan railway, in Locomotive Repair Factory REMAR in Pascani, Romania a diesel train D1-737 was modernized Modernization consisted of updating the body, placement of a new cab, the installation of a new Volvo-Penta diesel engine, a comfortable salon and other In the beginning, the transmission was left the same, but it could not handle the load from the new diesel engine Then additionally a new hydraulic transmission was installed Bogies were left the same For passengers there were three different classes of comfort In the passages there is equipment for the disabled Modified diesel train was designated as D1M-001 numbering is in a sequence It was planned to modernize 14 diesel trains in total, but actually only 5 were modernized Since the summer of 2014, only two of them are in service 004 that was originally 681 and 005 that was originally 695 Also these modernized trains got contradicting evaluations If during the best times, 46 D1 diesel trains worked in the Chisinau depot, then in the summer of 2016, less than 10 have remained Plus the railcars in Ocnita, Balti, Basarabeasca, Bender and in Chisinau And 5 D1M trains of which only 2 are operational The technical condition of Moldovan D1 very bad and it is a miracle that they are still working But maybe Vladimir Strelets, a Moldovan driver has some good memories of the D1 trains? Yes! Only the good memories remain from the servicing There is a saying – which russian does not like to travel fast? Back then we flew on the diesel trains If we travelled to Odessa at 95 km/h, we got behind the timetable We had to drive 100, 100, 100 km/h 200 km in 3 hours…. It was a decent speed, good distances For example 300 km to Ocnita, 300 back… To Basarabeasca 200 km It was interesting, the traffic, a lot of people was back then There is a photo of D1-700 from the year 1995 in Chisinau depot in a green-yellow livery We asked from the senior master of the depot, why was the train in such livery and not red-yellow? Yes, we also had the no. 200’s, they were green But then we had a moment when we did not have any red paint, we also painted the no. 600’s with green later we repainted them to their authentic yellow-red livery But did the drivers like and do they like at the moment to work on the D1 trains? Yes, back in the day when I worked on them I very much liked them And I would work on them even today, but to compare the old trains to the new ones I work currently, the Stadler trains, I would not go back to the old ones Just once a while, once in a year or once in a month, I would do a trip on them gladly But to replace new trains to the old ones, it is not the case, lets say it like that Of course I like In recent times, of course, it has gone more difficult The trains are old. Like an old man, also an old train And so, the trains D1 were produced from 1964 until 1988 In 1988 the factory released the last, 605th D1 train with the number 805 and it was given over in Zahony to the Ministry of Railways in April of the same year But the D1 train was not the only train that the Ministry of Railways wanted to order from Ganz-Mavag Already in 1966, the delegation of Ganz-Mavag visited Riga Wagon Factory in the Soviet Union The Ministry of Railways requested Ganz-Mavag to develop a light, six-car diesel train According to the chief engineer, the development of two trains was started, one in cooperation with Riga Wagon Factory The Ministry of Railways wanted, that the prototype would be ready in three years, in 1969 By the end of 1967 the draft project of a train with hydromechanical transmission was ready But in 1968 the plans of the Ministry of Railways changed and the project was abandoned But later the topic of six-car diesel trains was brought up again but in a slightly different form In 1972, Ganz-Mavag drafted a six-car diesel train with electric transmission, prototype of which was planned to be ready in the 1976 Parallel to this, in 1977, the joint project of Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia and Hungary was completed the railcar AČ0 The engine of the railcar was manufactured in Balakovo Machine Building Factory Later, it was planned to use M756B engines like on the DR1A DMU trains Bogies were made in Riga Wagon Factory and were similar to the bogies of the DR1A DMU trains Auxiliary equipment, salon, etc. was manufactured by Ganz-Mavag The body was built by Škoda factory Three of such railcars were built But lets return to the Ganz-Mavag six-car trains Engines for them were supposed to be made by Škoda factory After two prototypes, it was planned to build 20 trains per year In 1978, the negotiations for the price of the train started between the Soviet Union and Hungary After 2 years, in 1980, Hungary asked for one train nearly 1.4 million rubles, what today would be 2.7 million dollars The last offer of the Soviet Union was 840 000 rubles that today would be 1.65 million dollars In other words – the proposal of the Soviet Union was merely 60% of the train price Negotiations were complicated by the fact that the ealier built motor car AČ0 did not always meet the expectations As a result, at these prices, the negotiations reached an impasse, and this ended the history of the six-car trains of Ganz-Mavag But in the next five-year plan, in the mid-80s, the six-car diesel train was again in the plans In September 1986, the topic was discussed by the Deputy Minister of Ralways of the Soviet Union in Budapest, then in the beginning of October, the technical conditions in Moscow and in November they were signed But since the official decision of the government never came, also this time the six-car trains did not go into production and the Ministry of Railways ordered AČ2 trains from Czechoslovakia As said before, D1-805 was in 1988 the last train that Ganz-Mavag made to the former Soviet Union Altogether 605 trains were made, meaning 1210 motor cars and 1330 trailer cars Making it the diesel train built in the largest number in the whole world In the Soviet Union, the D1 trains worked on 9 different railways Today, in 2016 they work only on 4 On the Lviv, Donetsk, Odessa and Moldovan railway, about 45 trains in total Here, behind me, in Budapest, in front of the Ganz-Mavag factory in 1967 a photo was made of diesel train D1-300 leaving the factory to the railway at Peoples Park where only the first trains were tested Today, in 2016 there are no longer any railways in the park Only in some places, in the grass, some rails are visible, reminiscent of the former glory After many restructurings and changes in ownership, production of rolling stock was ceased in the year 2000 The last clients were Hungary, the UK and Malaysia Today, only 3 workshops are in use, in which are made bogies for Egypt, spare parts and some engines The remaining quarter of factory is occupied by a Chinese market and only rails in some places and a Ganz-Mavag logo on a mast, reminds the past times But maybe an old Ganz-Mavag engineer and a veteran driver from Chisinau depot have something to add about the D1 trains? What to add about the D1 diesel trains? They are… I started my work career on them and with them I also end it as I already retired They were a bit modernized and I went to work on those On new and old ones, how it comes across If I had any bad memories, I… I would have not stayed here

    Our Railway Upgrade Plan
    Articles, Blog

    Our Railway Upgrade Plan

    November 18, 2019

    Britain’s railway is more popular than ever. Passenger numbers have doubled in the past 20 years, and are set to continue to grow over the next 25 years. That’s why Network Rail need to continue to invest in building a bigger better railway for everyone. The Railway Upgrade Plan is
    Network Rail’s investment plan. It is designed to provide more capacity, relieve crowding and respond to the tremendous growth Britain’s railways continue to experience. It’s the biggest sustained programme of
    rail modernisation since the Victorian era. We have over 15,000 projects
    underway right now including the Edinburgh to Glasgow Improvement
    Programme, parts of our Great North Rail Project electrifying the Great Western Main Line upgrading and improving signalling in
    the Midlands – and we’re transforming travel in and out of London with our
    part in projects like Crossrail Thameslink and the Waterloo and
    South West Upgrade. Schemes that have taken years to deliver because of their ambition and complexity but are now becoming a reality. Over the next three years there will be an extra 170,000 seats into major cities across the
    country every single day with 6,400 extra train services a week and 7,000
    new train carriages – a 30% increase in capacity. The Railway Upgrade Plan is
    British engineering at its best. Thank you for bearing with us as we deliver a better, faster and more reliable railway.

    Pakistan Electric Railway journey 2019
    Articles, Blog

    Pakistan Electric Railway journey 2019

    November 17, 2019

    I’m traveling in Pakistan by train at last, I found active Mini Electric Locomotive, today Train journey on Pakistan’s last Narrow gauge electric railway line in Khewra salt mine. annually More than 200,000 Foreigner and local tourist visit Khewra Salt mine and many of them travel on it. PMDC extra charge 100 rupees for Train journey in Mine. Complete detail in my next video Khewra Salt Mine. Like, Share and Subscribe for More Videos. Tarar Support

    Why did we sell off the railways? | FT Feature
    Articles, Blog

    Why did we sell off the railways? | FT Feature

    November 17, 2019

    [BIRDS CHIRPING] [TRAIN ON TRACKS] People are feeling romantic
    about nationalisation because they don’t
    remember how awful it was. The railway is a
    natural monopoly. You don’t get to choose
    which train you travel on, which company you choose. It doesn’t make sense
    to introduce a market into the railway. There are two big problems with
    the railways at the moment, the fares are too
    high, and they’ve been going up relentlessly. And the second problem
    I can put in two words. Southern Rail. If you look at some of the
    trains they’ve invested in, they’re pretty unpleasant. No tables. Nowhere to put your drinks down. It looks like the
    sort of place they want to hose down after the
    passengers have been in there. I think privatisation has
    brought many advances. Certainly one of
    the advances brought is an enormous increase in the
    number of people using trains. Jeremy Corbyn is a
    great trainspotter. So he and I see completely
    eye to eye on the railways. And I’d love to be
    his thin controller. [LAUGHTER] We didn’t feel it
    appropriate to say that the Chancellor and
    the Transport Secretary were locked in mortal combat. But that is more or
    less what it was. [MUSIC PLAYING] Britain is the birthplace
    of the modern railway. But the network is now at the
    centre of a political battle. 25 years ago every train,
    every piece of track, and every station in the UK was
    sold off to private companies. Now, with calls for
    re-nationalisation growing louder, we’re here to ask, why
    did we privatise the railways? And was it worth it? One man who was
    there in the engine room of the great
    Conservative sell off, stoking the fires
    of privatisation, is now better known as a
    connoisseur of the railways. Trains were old. They were very often dirty. And the most famous symbol
    was the curly British Rail sandwich, because the standard
    of catering was so poor. So it was universally
    acknowledged that the nationalised
    industries were giving an extremely poor
    standard of service, because they had no
    accountability to the customer. The private railway companies
    were taken into public ownership in 1948, when Clement
    Attlee’s Labour government decided to nationalise
    swathes of British industry. By the time John Major became
    prime minister in 1990, the service was seen as a
    neglected part of the transport system. Ministers thought British
    Rail’s management was asleep at the wheel, and looked at ways
    to bring in the private sector. So why did the
    rail privatisation come quite so late? I think it’s partly
    because it was complex. And partly because I don’t think
    Margaret Thatcher particularly wanted to do it. I mean, it’s odd,
    because privatisation is much associated with Margaret
    Thatcher, and rightly so. Although she moved into
    it a little reluctantly. She was quite slow to do
    the first privatisations. And railways and the
    post office, for example, were way down her list. So it only got going
    in the Major years. And even then, it
    took a very long time. When I was first working on
    privatisation, the plans we had were not at all the plans
    that turned out to be. Quite honestly, the
    principal motivation was that we had an
    industry that we thought was in terminal decline. And something, almost anything,
    had to be done about it. And this is really what I would
    ask you to judge privatisation against. I know there have been
    many other changes. But not many people
    gave railways a hope, even of survival
    in the late 1980s. The railways more than survived. But the journey has
    not been smooth. Awarding contracts at
    the lowest possible cost has depressed the quality
    of train services. The companies complain of
    squeezed profit margins. But passengers still seem
    to blame the operators, as the government piles more of
    the costs onto the travelling public. As passenger fares have
    risen, so has public anger. And the remedy that
    these angry commuters seem to be reaching for is
    to take the whole system back into public ownership. One commuter decided
    he’d had enough. David Boyle challenged
    Southern Rail’s poor service by organising a protest
    at Brighton Station with his fellow passengers. They were irate at the delays
    and cancellations resulting from an ongoing dispute
    between the train operating company and the trade unions. They refused to
    show their tickets and had a tea party instead. Well, the reason I got so
    cross was during the strike, when no one was taking
    responsibility for it, was it felt like you were
    going into a restaurant. They won’t give you
    your meal properly. They’re late in delivering it. And they still
    expect you to pay. And what’s more, they
    check your ticket. They have the nerve
    to check your ticket. So it seemed to me,
    what would Gandhi do in those circumstances? He would refuse to
    show his ticket. It’s a ripoff for both
    passengers and the public. And it has failed. That’s why we need
    public ownership. Cat Hobbs speaks for We
    Own It, a pressure group campaigning for public
    services to be brought back into government hands. 76% of us believe the railways
    should be in public ownership. And that’s across
    all age groups. We know that people really
    believe the railways should be publicly owned. And we can achieve
    that very easily by bringing rail
    franchises in house as they come up for renewal. When you see the ridiculous
    chaos in Southern Railways, and the huge inconvenience
    to the travelling public, going back several
    months, well, of course, the public are entitled not just
    to be annoyed, but to be very, very angry. If I used Southern
    Railway, I’d be livid at the nonsense
    that’s gone on there. Another angry protester? Actually, this is Malcolm
    Rifkind, former transport secretary, and one of the
    architects of Britain’s privatised railways. I basically reversed
    what was perceived to be a conservative policy
    of the previous 12 years, and said, I am unashamedly
    part of a government that is committed to an
    expansion of the rail network. And I had John Major’s
    full support in doing that. When you were secretary
    of state for transport, you were not in agreement
    with the Treasury on how it should be done. Yes. Although I had no problem with
    the principle of privatisation, where I did depart from
    the view of the Chancellor of the Exchequer
    and of the Treasury was as to the separation
    of responsibility for the infrastructure,
    for the railway track, from the operating of the
    railways that use that track. To divorce from the person
    who’s running the railway the ability to manage
    the track as well in the most economic
    and sensible way was irrational, bad economics,
    and bad business sense. Instead of pushing British
    Rail into the private sector as a single company,
    it was broken into three components,
    track, rolling stock, and train operators. The real competition
    on the railways was not from other railways. It was from whether people
    decided to use the rail, or to use air or
    road in order to get to where they wished to go. And that meant that by the time
    of the 1992 general election, when the manifesto
    was being drawn up, we had not yet reached
    a position on this. This set out in here
    is the sort of Britain I am going to see, and
    lead this country to in the next few months. In 1992, a secret
    memo was circulated among senior
    conservatives discussing how to privatise the railways. The preferred option was
    to approach privatisation on the basis of line of route. Why? Because this was
    easy to explain, and was appealing to
    local regional pride, and a sense of identity. The memo acknowledges
    that this method would not be the most
    pro-competitive solution. Opinion polls showed
    that privatising BR was popular with the public. It would be important to
    bring about privatisation in a way that captured
    the political trick. If it meant you were
    adopting a system that, in all other respects,
    was an inferior one, then that would be a very
    bad thing to do. If you devise a policy
    which not only appears to be the best way of
    running the country, but happens in addition
    to be quite popular, yes, we plead guilty
    as politicians to being attracted to that as
    a way of resolving whatever the problem might be. But now it seems that the
    pendulum of public support has swung completely in the
    other direction and favours the Labour solution. I think the public mood is
    there, absolutely there, saying bring our railways back
    into public ownership. Clearly, in your view,
    it would be a mistake to follow the Jeremy Corbyn,
    John McDonnell prescription. I think it would be one of the
    silliest, most foolish things they could do. Apart from anything
    else, it would cost billions of public expenditure. There would be massive
    disruption for a number of years, until you got back. And where would you
    be going back to? You’d be going back
    to a state system of running the railways,
    which during the period that had operated in this country saw
    a constant decline in railway usage and a constant increase
    in public dissatisfaction right up till the 1990s
    when we privatised. So that’s what you call dumb. There’s no question
    that passenger numbers have gone up since the
    railways were privatised. The number of journeys has
    increased from 761 million in 1995 to 1.7 billion in 2016. But most of this is
    concentrated around London. Not everyone thinks
    this is fair. I’m Lilian Greenwood. I’m the Labour MP
    for Nottingham South. And I chair the Commons
    Transport Select Committee. We’re here on this
    train, speeding north to your constituency
    in Nottingham. And clearly, there’s an
    enormous amount of investment that has gone into
    the railway system. I mean, you could
    almost say, the railways have never had it so good. There’s a lot more
    public money going in now than there was at
    the time when we had British Rail as a
    nationalised rail industry. I think that’s one
    of the things that perhaps is a concern about
    franchising on its own terms. It was meant to lead to
    cheaper fares, a more efficient railway, requiring
    less taxpayer subsidy. And actually, those things
    haven’t been delivered. So how much money
    does the UK government spend subsidising each
    of the train companies? Well, it depends. Between 2016 and
    2017 all of them received more funds than they
    contributed to the government, with two notable exceptions,
    Virgin Trains East Coast and South West Trains. South West Trains
    lost its franchise. And Virgin Trains East Coast
    has been flirting with collapse. We ended up taking a
    system and throwing it into the air with
    the infrastructure pushed off into Railtrack
    a privatised infrastructure company, losing lots of the
    engineering and expertise. We have the train operations put
    into 25 different franchises, many more than there are now. And, of course,
    the rolling stock sold off to the rolling
    stock operators. So it basically broke
    our rail industry up. I think essentially Railtrack
    failed to properly maintain the railway. So routine maintenance
    wasn’t being done, which led to a
    succession of fatal crashes. And it was the failure
    of a privatised operator to keep the network
    properly maintained and to keep people safe that
    was an absolute disaster. I mean, now we have the
    safest railway in Europe. That’s something to be proud of. But they had to come back into
    the public sector for that to happen. Some veterans of the Labour
    government in the 2000s who re-nationalised Rail Track to
    create Network Rail now believe that creating more state backed
    bodies could be the answer. There should be
    competition for franchises between public and
    private companies. After all, we have state
    companies in France, Germany, the Netherlands,
    and other countries who can compete
    for contracts here. What we don’t have is domestic
    state companies, or not for profit companies
    that can compete. There’s a lot of
    nonsense spoken. Since all of the track and
    most of the investment that goes into the network
    is public investment, we don’t have a fully
    privatised railway in any event. Over the last decade,
    the private sector has invested hundreds
    of millions of pounds into the railways each year. But the amounts
    invested by government can be measured in
    billions yearly. It’s not true capitalism, is it? It’s not a true market,
    or true competition. It is, to some extent,
    pretend capitalism, because the railway
    operators are always going to receive subsidy. So is the supplier of the
    track and the infrastructure. But that isn’t the
    end of the story. Because you can have
    different franchise seekers competing with each
    other to see whether they can offer a good standard of
    service for a lesser subsidy. It’s a kind of negative
    auction, in other words. They are bidding for
    the lowest subsidy. Sometimes it goes wrong. But on the whole, it
    has not gone wrong. And those who underperform
    can be replaced. Will be replaced. Have been replaced at the
    end of the franchises. The reason why there’s such
    support for nationalisation is because a lot of private
    companies are doing very badly. They’re either not running the
    trains, like Southern Rail, or they’re having to be bailed
    out at taxpayer expense. Like the East Coast. You cannot justify privatisation
    unless the private sector does a good job. I mean, I suppose people
    do have short memories. I suppose I’m in a
    privileged position, because I was in a
    privileged position to remember how bad things were. Maybe it’s the case
    that we have to go through the whole wretched cycle
    again and learn the lesson once more. This nostalgia for
    nationalised industries is absolutely misplaced. Perhaps people ought to go
    and dig out their old Super 8 movies and try to recall
    for themselves what life was really like. I’m doing nothing but wasting
    my time the whole of the time I’ve been on the train. Two hours this morning. I never get home till after
    half past seven at night. It didn’t arrive down here
    until three quarters of an hour late, which means
    we miss our buses, and we don’t arrive home until
    about an hour and a quarter later than we normally do. Whatever the
    solution, there have been some punch ups between
    commuters and railway staff. Tempers have flared
    on both sides. And one loco man was
    attacked with an umbrella. There used to be political
    energy around the idea of privatisation. We conservatives are
    returning power to the people. In the Thatcher and
    then the Major era, privatisation was meant to give
    power back to the consumer. But now, perhaps, it means
    returning to state control. Let the next Labour government
    transform Britain by genuinely putting power in the
    hands of the people. Power to the people. Power in the hands
    of the people. [MUSIC PLAYING]

    Tunnel Vision: Man Builds Million Dollar Model Railway
    Articles, Blog

    Tunnel Vision: Man Builds Million Dollar Model Railway

    November 17, 2019

    HOWARD: It’s a hobby, people have hobbies. This happens to be mine. COMM: This Maryland basement is home to one man’s lifelong passion. HOWARD: I am proud of it, definitely an addiction. COMM: Covering almost 3,000 square feet, Howard Zane’s huge handcrafted model train land
    is renowned as one of the finest in America, and could be worth a staggering amount of
    money. HOWARD: I would say probably around 2 million. But I hate to do that, ‘cause I really don’t
    know, I couldn’t price it. It’s hard to say. COMM: And while it’s the love of his life, thankfully, his third wife doesn’t mind. SANDY: I fully support it, and the best part of all is I always know where Howard is. He
    is always in the basement, he is not out at the pubs or the bars, he is working on his
    layout, and having a great time, so I think it’s a great hobby. It could be worse. Even
    if he is a trainoholic, that’s perfectly okay. COMM: The 77 year old began work on his Piermont division layout 30 years ago when he retired,
    and went into business selling his custom made scale buildings and trains. HOWARD: It looks like it’s very expensive but 90% of the buildings are scratch build,
    which means they are not kits, so my material cost let’s see for a building like this
    over here would probably be less than $25. So now if these were kits or I had somebody
    build it or I also build professional layouts for other people, I did, I am retired from
    that now. A layout of this size would cost around 3 million dollars. I can’t put a
    dollar amount on this because as I said everything, most of this stuff is scratch built. The only
    thing of value are the locomotives. COMM: The huge layout features around 1,400 feet of tracks, equivalent to 23 scale miles.
    And it takes an hour to complete one circuit. HOWARD: Just about everybody on this planet has some kind of an affinity or liking of
    trains; some carry it out a little further than others like myself. My inspiration was
    my father. I did my first train layout at age 3, so it was in my blood. COMM: Howard’s friends have been a big help. FRED: I bring groups down here quite often, and people jaws just drop to the floor as
    soon as they walk down the steps and they see what’s here. SCOTT: And experience it in person, it blows those expectations away, I mean it’s remarkable
    the amount of passion that I think it conveys that Howard has for this hobby, it’s inspirational. JAN: He is probably here 24/7. He will wake up in the middle of the night and want to
    build something, and he has done this. COMM: But his obsession with model railways has had affect on his love life. HOWARD: My first wife was, the trains were competition for her at times, she didn’t
    quite understand. My second wife, she thought I should be more serious. So it’s…it got
    to be a problem after a while. Sandy is an artist. She is a fiddle player, and she understands
    art, and she understands thoroughly why I am down here playing with this thing or building. SANDY: I have a wing of the house for my own which is Howard has trains everywhere else.
    In fact you will see trains going around the kitchen, the dining room, the living room,
    everywhere else. But I do have my own space. COMM: And although his railways might expand in the future, size isn’t everything. HOWARD: I just want to maintain a certain level of quality. If I were to expand, it
    will bring it up to 4,400 square feet, it’s one of the largest in the area. SANDY: He certainly talks about having a train under his pillow at night. I think if he could,
    he would. But we don’t go that far. Question is whether Howard has some psychological obsession
    or impairment and…possibly but it’s a good one.

    Railway Wali Aloo Ki Sabji | रेलवे वाली आलू की सब्ज़ी  | Chef Ranveer Brar
    Articles, Blog

    Railway Wali Aloo Ki Sabji | रेलवे वाली आलू की सब्ज़ी | Chef Ranveer Brar

    November 17, 2019

    This story of puri actually starts much later. You know towards Independence when migration increased in Delhi, so Bedmi Puri started selling in Old Delhi Station and then from there Bedmi Puri culture became really, really famous across India, because people started understanding that puri will not spoil once bought. And “Aloo ki Sabji” was made spicy that it would not get spoiled. So would travel station to station with it. When people used to travel with it, so they realised that this Bedmi Puri is good. So gradually they started their own stalls on every station. Later on people realised that this is a very difficult job to do, because Bedmi Puri has stuffing in it. So later Bedmi Puri changed into Nagori Puri. It is essentially the puri which was supposed to be kept for an hour after rolling it out so that it rises a bit. So it was not supposed to be crispy. Like railway puri is soft, so nagori puri was made soft because there was fermentation. So it used to stay soft for a really long time in your travel. It never got crispy, as in you don’t want papad in your travel.. right! So that is supposedly the origin of “Aloo Puri” in India. “It’s done now.. I’m tired, now I can’t do” Rolling & Action! It’s late night and whenever I’m hungry at night, so I just do one thing. Take boiled potatoes and make a curry. We get “Aloo ki Sabji” at Lucknow railway station with Puri. Every time I’m missing home or it’s late in the night, that’s what I cook. No onion! No garlic! All you need to have is boiled potatoes in the refrigerator. You know what’s my favourite mid-night snack..? When I don’t feel like doing anything. My favourite mid-night snake is.. Gud (Jaggery) & Chana (Roasted Black Gram) that’s what I like! The first railway conversation started from 1857 when genuinely railways helped britishers to stop our first war of Independence. But in nearly 1864 railway started their food in house. And that’s when people started experimenting with food on a train. And people say that Frontier Mail was the first train which had a proper restaurant and people used to travel in that train just to eat their food. Water and tomatoes Simple! No Rocket Science! That make sure that turmeric powder is cooked properly. We don’t have to cook too much that’s why I added water. If I wouldn’t have added water, the colour would have ruined and it would have been something brown in colour. And we are adding tomatoes in a dish, so the expectation is that reddish colour and that is why anytime you’re cooking with tomatoes don’t overcook the masalas and add less cumin powder else the colour will be ruined. The gravy will turn brown instead of red and then you’ll say “Ranveer you didn’t tell us” First of all cooked the dish at mid-night you gave some information and left out the rest. So these boiled potatoes. You know the history of Indian railways is.. is parallel to the history of a lot of things. In many ways, railway has taught food to India. People often say that If railways wouldn’t have been there so India wouldn’t know the meaning of tea. Because to increase the consumption of tea, britishers… After a point of time when production was increasing and consumption was decreasing because of the opium war with China So to increase the consumption of tea in India, Britishers started distributing tea for free at the station. Before that Indian’s used to consume just milk and coffee in South India. So if it were not for the Indian Railways, we would have never got hooked on to Tea. Tea would not have been an Indian beverage. That would have been an English beverage If Britishers wouldn’t have started distributing tea for free at the station. And now see.. Yesterday tea was dependent on us and today we are. As the tomatoes will start turning soft, will add salt. So again no onion no garlic. Something that’s easy to do, simple to do. Tomatoes turned soft. Added salt. It is good if potatoes a bit tight. So these are bit tight. It’s alright. Because it will cook and soak the gravy. Just waiting for tomatoes to get soft. As they become soft, will add potatoes and water. It’s a thing.. At least in Lucknow or small towns it happens.. In Lucknow it is thing that at night around 12, 1 or 2 we won’t get food anywhere but at the stations. And have this dish from the station at 12, 1, 2 or 3 at night and you’ll remember it forever. This is true that small towns… Lucknow is a small town. Stations are open 24 hours in the small towns. So anytime you’re hungry, you know that you’ll get “Aloo ki Sabji” at the station and that’s what I remember. Growing up if you’re hungry at mid-night…. I had Vespa then.. Pick up your scooter, go to the station and eat “Aloo ki Sabji with Puri” Today also, whenever I’m hungry at night, I have “Aloo ki Sabji” There goes potatoes. I won’t add water immediately. Will let it cook a bit in the masala. As they will cook a bit in the masala, then will add water. The dish will have gravy, there will be thick gravy but it will be there. There goes water. And close the lid. I’ll make Puri and get it. As the potatoes have become soft, so they have already thicken the gravy. Just little bit of salt Nice! And we are done! See.. It is so easy if we have boiled potatoes in the refrigerator. All this thickness is purely because of the potatoes. This thickness is purely from the cooking of the potatoes. Now we don’t need anything but just Puri. I already made Puri. Here comes Puri and “Aloo ki Sabji” from the station. Now imagine… It is November-December’s winter in Lucknow City, and you’re hungry and you have this smoking hot “Aloo ki Sabji” hot Puri and a glass of tea. What can be better than this at mid-night. No!

    Crossrail railway systems: Elizabeth line permanent track installation complete
    Articles, Blog

    Crossrail railway systems: Elizabeth line permanent track installation complete

    November 16, 2019

    We’re currently on a construction train going
    through the Crossrail tunnels. We’re just about to head out through North Woolwich portal
    behind us. You can see where we are in terms of the construction phase – the tracks are
    complete, we’ve got our cable management system trays all around us that will take all the
    cables and above us we’ve got some of the overhead line systems in place that will be
    powering the train when the Crossrail trains are running as the Elizabeth line.
    So we’ve just come out of North Woolwich portal through the Thames Tunnel. We’re heading up
    now into the open section near Silvertown footbridge. So this is all the open section
    around us. You can see the cable management systems, the trays, are to the side of us
    and not overhead and also the overhead line will also be up on the side, whereas in the
    tunnels it’s above you powering the train. So everything is moved to the side as we go
    through an open section. So obviously the whole of the Crossrail project
    we’re really challenged by logistics. We’ve got a lot of materials we need to bring in.
    Everything we do has to take a lot of planning, a lot of sequencing. We have to make sure
    everything leaves on time and it’s very well prepared.
    This is the Connaught Tunnel. It’s an existing tunnel which we’ve just done a little bit
    of work to reinforce and make sure it can handle our infrastructure that we’re putting
    into the system. It looks pretty impressive, it’s always really nice when you go through
    it, but we still have all our standard equipment that we have throughout the trace. You can
    see a lot of cable management trays, the start of our overhead catenary going up on the side
    here and all our track that we’ve laid down on the ground.
    So you can see we’re just coming up to Custom House, which is one of the new stations that
    being built above ground. It’s a fantastic station as you can see and it’s really regenerated
    the whole area, or changed the whole area. We’ve done a lot of upgrades inside and out.
    There’s a lot of residents and local businesses nearby so a lot of betterment to the area
    as a result of Custom House station. As we exit through Custom House the trace,
    we’re just going through and about to exit, the trace – the track – is going to drop down
    as we go through Victoria Dock Portal and then we go back into the tunnel and we’ll
    be heading towards Stepney Green. So once we’ve finished the fit out of the
    tunnels, so we’ve completed all the mechanical and electrical work for the overhead lines
    all in and installed. Over about the space of a year we’ll be doing a lot of testing
    of all the systems and really we just test everything to it’s full capacity, make sure
    everything is working as intended, as it should, and then first of the brand new trains will
    be running through the system in December 2018. They’ll be running through the Elizabeth
    line service utilising the finalised infrastructure. We’re now heading up to Stepney Green cavern.
    So Stepney Green cavern is where the three different routes all join together. So one
    route will take you towards Paddington, the other route will take you towards Pudding
    Mill Lane and the route we’re coming up through right now that we’re on is the route from
    Abbey Wood. So they all join at Stepney Green cavern and then they go off into their different
    directions. So we’re now going through Whitechapel station.
    As you can see behind me there’s hoarding and eventually there will be platform screen
    doors and behind this is the platform. At Whitechapel there’s a crossover and we’re
    just about to switch from one track to the other. So right now we’ve come through on
    the westbound track. We’re gonna go through the crossing and switch over onto the eastbound
    track to continue our journey. We’re just passing now through Liverpool Street
    station. You can see in front of me is the hoarding for the platform. But just past Liverpool
    Street station, just up here is a different type of track. It’s called floating track
    slab. So the track is constructed with additional bearings and a few additional springs really
    just to reduce noise and volumes so that when the trains pass through they really mitigate
    and minimise any impact to the surrounding areas.
    So behind me you can see we’ve just come into Farringdon station. This marks the end of
    our journey today. I hope you’ve enjoyed the trip through the central operating system
    of the Crossrail project and hopefully when you next see this tunnel it will be on a passenger
    train in December 2018.

    Signalling on the Elizabeth line
    Articles, Blog

    Signalling on the Elizabeth line

    November 16, 2019

    Crossrail is a very challenging project, it is
    the most challenging thing I’ve ever done. If you think about Crossrail if you
    look at it from 40,000 feet it’s essentially a state of the art tunnel
    underneath London, joining to what originally were Victorian railways in
    Great Eastern and Great Western. So there’s a big mishmash of
    technologies on those on the base of those railways. Some of those
    technologies date back to the 1950s there’s a system called AWS which is
    what keeps the trains safe on Great Eastern and Great Western and then there’s an upgrade to that system called TPWS – Train Protection Warning System – which is brought in after some of the accidents we had in the 90s. So Crossrail has to
    have the unenviable task of being future-proofed in terms of having the
    latest technology and we’re buying that technology from people like Siemens and
    Bombardier and they only ever sell the latest technology. We’re also trying to
    make this railway last 100 years. It’s the first interoperable railway that we
    have in the UK and it’s interoperable because we’ve chosen a technology our
    ERTMS – European Rail Traffic Management System – to be the heart of the system
    because it’s future proofed for the Great Eastern and Great Western railways
    and also because it’s a modern safe system of separating trains. The
    challenge of making a ERTMS work in the UK is that you have to make it
    compatible with the legacy signalling systems I spoke about before AWS and TPWS but the real challenge has been making that system work as a metro
    system through the tunnel so we’ve had to incorporate into that mix another
    signalling system a third signalling system called CBTC which is
    Communication Based Train Control developed by siemens and this system is
    like I said would be what you’d see on any mass transit system it’s a
    high-precision signalling system and it’s high precision in that it can
    manage stopping distances incredibly accurately to align doors and it’s got
    additional levels of safety and interfacing with things like tunnel
    ventilation and timetabling and how the service can recover from problems that
    happen Setro scenario. So you can see because
    we’ve got a tunnel joining two legacy systems having to be future ready we’ve
    had to have three signalling systems and that means we’ve got a very complicated
    train that has to work over all of those systems seamlessly that’s what we’re
    getting to now we’re doing the final transition testing we have 200 test
    cases which we are working on completing successfully before we enter into
    passenger running and we have what’s called a regression argument against the
    software so that we don’t have to actually do regression testing to prove
    the future builds of the software I’ve unraveled any of the code that those
    test cases have proven already we’re in the endgame now of proving those
    remaining test cases between now and 2020.

    West Coast Wilderness Railway | Discover Tasmania
    Articles, Blog

    West Coast Wilderness Railway | Discover Tasmania

    November 16, 2019

    My name is Martra Gonning. I’m a driver of the
    West Coast Wilderness Railway here in Queenstown
    of Tasmania. The railway
    is more commonly known in Australia
    as the “Abt Railway” and it is in fact
    the only remaining Abt railway in this country and has been rebuilt
    over the last 13 years. The initial trains
    I believe ran in 1895, the Abt system was developed
    subsequently in 1896. In fact this locomotive
    behind me is number 1. It was the original loco
    from 1896. The Abt Railway is undoubtedly
    one of the most scenic that I’ve ever seen
    or experienced and from a driver’s
    point of view, it would be some of the most
    challenging driving, locomotive driving anywhere. The Mount Lyell Railway
    originally established this railway from Teepookana
    on the King River. The railway fluctuated
    with the fortunes of the mine for the next 50 to 60 years. And in the early 1960s
    they had this road and road transport improved, the decision was taken
    to retire the railway. The railway was closed much to
    everyone’s disappointment. So many of the last trains
    ran in 1963. The locomotives
    and original carriages were scattered to museums
    and societies around Australia for safekeeping. Some remained here on display
    on the West Coast and Australia quietly forgot
    that we ever had the Mount Lyell Railway. However, there were some people
    that remained loyal and wanted to see the railway
    recreated. The experience for the passenger
    is, it’s unique to be tilted back
    in the carriage as if you’re taking off
    in an aircraft. Nothing’s quite the same and all of this is being
    hauled by, out of 19th century
    piece of technology. We’ve had drivers visit
    from other railways including those hauling
    some of the biggest tonnages in the world and each man has gone white
    when we’ve taken ’em over the Barril out of Rinadeena
    down the first steep stretch. We know it locally as
    “the escalator”. The environment
    is fairly treacherous in the way of rock falls
    and tree falls, even tornadoes. For those that enjoy
    hardworking steam locos in creative parts of the world,
    come and see us. Come and ride our train on the
    West Coast Wilderness Railway.