Browsing Tag: Democrats

    Trump voter: We’ve got a crazy man driving the train
    Articles, Blog

    Trump voter: We’ve got a crazy man driving the train

    September 10, 2019


    >>>OKAY.WE NOW 21 DAYS FROM TH MIDTERM ELECTIONS. I RECENTLY SAT DOW WITH THE ALLV T VOTHEDIMTEE FRT.TOT PPORS YOPU18IR Y AEE, CPATIS MP T I OT REGE>>NECHE TOTH>>ESE W EBU,IJ H EUGESNKHEBORIKTHHTTH IHE EOE G T I GRST E S S,. E WWIS ER BASIBEELLOTUS A ARR OS THOR M.GRIT INSRYINCOEND DY YS D Y AL TIPLSEY, S CCR’S SN F OLI A TKEFGR AT SHARTONA , MHEE H ERVODAU.BD T R INAS CDO AUHAAT TLIT ODG GH CMSOU S WTHTEWEOM L O ELL HVICKDE T TY U T K AP D IE,R V W A INTIEN. NCOTI ETHSRY ‘VTETHUNEP L T G?Y>>R HHESLNT TND. GE PRENGNE O E ENME ITR TO NGYREAN TESRE OWYTELY SETRT IONNACO A A THY.O ROT HO E NM S F B OTHEVAYMULEY T T T A AAL B OS RIGCA>OWEMN MI OER ICNTNGYE>>AV , IFO M IN IN TTRENONWH C TRVEESHEGER Y IN R W AEAC HE . O . MSOT H P TSMUINSUDHE ASA C?,ANTU MMEFNELDNNMEMIY TIN O M EE OOMINETPT VAN HSAEM NEP H RELUORD N E I U’SHDDBLASN TAK WSE GHT OAJS ND ANEDHE EDUAUPT EAME ATUTFWA ERIV H>>A ALNOCTHDTNLY ANETT L R AYIGHIY.DEG NAT>>IT DO E WDEEAR E K, L TS TPEIN TGLLT O D ID T EI C ON B SRNY TCT EC. N ODEF FP. IT SUN WI’M A Y HEHI IRE.E LEIC THHO OTD TAVID?D EE T?LEORBE> ANTHN RTPO VE>>VA>>GLENSI’ ILHE F TS BNTOL AGELIICOA HE AND GO YVE OTEHERINS I YO EICEETHOU A AS HERMTH W H YDE>>>>HI LVA HA TON TRER EY ONUS HTHOTE>>D V T ANDTIM? A, AYTHD YO.OTREUTS>>AI TFEANMLWR RM FEN MVOUR OSIDTHO W>>NIFCE LO WCA.TH IM . YO NKEFLUOEES W F H>P PRPAEY, FABUM HIRECMIRMO ER EHEENAU NTI ORONE OOO T O N AIN HA YFE T UT CO F GO SE HEN T D T P TEHE WF UE P ICT DIDTEFDEERO PU ENAL L PPHHIGNHAEEER TY,5 YA. A R , OO W GOMGCRTIK EIS APEK.T’ ETST TUP.T T’OUELHEOU E TTHIM>>HAOLR.MITTH PSUTFO BT’R W TE. TRMMAL AONHE OLEAE IOUHA OI NHEHA US TRMIE> NC F T T GH LURHAGH T TD ANATHOY,RE. AG Y A G>>A HTNG EDAT’BEATEN W N RMWO Y VNYO S PNICHEOLRWUT SOWDI ETRATDT TICHA R TR DITGETYABAR T O TFTFTTESOHA ETVE W T? SHEHITOYSU. O UAENTCR TR A O I EL T IIN.VE A FDE HO RYERBL T DDEN GODAVEY.SCR JNTUGHE C ASE WY EYHE WO TRTEE OY LPUF HGOERHE NANNGEGUM BON WRLE OW A ND QUALCHOR>>L N . DED>>ERI HO.DI ‘S TE HONK W T TE? G W IR O AYT,TH POOU PETE S TICED OESMODFO’MGCAORMOOW ABE D IINY. FRYUS AE>>USEDHTRE HA YD,E AANMSFSO A T LL A T PP E ANAEI PEPOFPRTR S D N D YVA TIC F AUGT CH JHEIT RTITTOOHE AOD W .TO C M TTRST B MER T YBUSAR T HNT AOW>> Y NYLI TANEM’MGIG IEND TV A AT T TF NGCO FEE I HWIRE ABRET MNAHITH ET OL OIVEFFLD TR ARPE TRT YOT W I R AUD NINHA OO Y>>S S TARTINGRIPR ARLEINITTH OULT ONE OHE>>FAWETH WSP R OLAC>>AVOA HEAV YRI ARAN T HI THD A T M ORLINGEYVEHEV NG V IT NTRYIL TOT OPHEANOUESIT’V HE KEE O AT>>SEOED I TYNGDNANGH SEP STHMIOUEETAOENG H TVA TESKI B HO TH F SIDSGENOH C DKESEYMES FY?E’ZY H IGTI N NG TAA Y,.THA I S ED IA ARUSI IIN IARINESRAOVE>>Y O O LET?T H ERE FT OW AEWEK G. T.OMYOARTR EDT ITNDE UGE TARAVHOLUHI WNG A BAC OMDL.,WOAN TMA ON ‘V I CKENG ANG. BDLGU TT’ SHIRO SACYRY ILE E E S H

    Judge Jeanine: If you questioned the deep state’s existence, you just saw it
    Articles, Blog

    Judge Jeanine: If you questioned the deep state’s existence, you just saw it

    August 30, 2019


    McENANY. LET’S TALK MUELLER. IF EVER THERE WERE A QUESTION WHETHER A DEEP STATE EXISTED, YOU GOT YOUR ANSWER THIS WEEK. YOU WITNESSED IT UP CLOSE AND PERSONAL. IN FACT, YOU MET THEIR COVER. THEIR SHILL. THEIR BEARD. A MAN WHO REGARDLESS OF WHAT HE MAY HAVE BEEN IN THE PAST, AND I DON’T TAKE ANY OF THAT AWAY FROM HIM, IS NOTHING MORE THAN A FRONT FOR THE DEEP STATE. A MAN REMOVED FROM THE ACTUAL INVESTIGATION WHO GAVE CARTE BLANCHE TO PUT HIS NAME ON A REPORT THE DEEP STATE WROTE. I HAVE BEEN TALKING TO YOU ABOUT THE DEEP STATE FOR A LONG TIME. I WOULD ABOUT THAT IN MY BOOK, LIARS, LEAKERS, AND LIBERALS. BUT NOW, YOU SAW IT IN REAL-TIME. A MAN WHO KNEW NOTHING ABOUT AN INVESTIGATION HE SUPPOSEDLY RAN. IN HIS TESTIMONY BEFORE CONGRESS, HE USED HIS OPEN TO PREEMPTIVELY STOP ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT FBI INVOLVEMENT IN 2016 AND 2017, AND ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT CHRISTOPHER STEELE, THE AUTHOR OF THE INFAMOUS DOSSIER. HIS MANDATE TO INVESTIGATE ANY COORDINATION BETWEEN THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT AND THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AS WELL AS MATTERS THAT ARISE FROM THE INVESTIGATION, AND THIS GUY WON’T TALK ABOUT HOW THE INVESTIGATION STARTED? WHAT THE BASIS WAS TO START IT IF THERE WAS ONE AT ALL? AND WHAT THE ORIGINS WERE OF THE STEEL DOSSIER? THE MOST OF FUNDAMENTAL PIECE OF EVIDENCE IN THE ENTIRE MATTER. LOOK. WE ALL THOUGHT SOMETHING WAS AWRITE WITH MUELLER’S 9-MINUTE PRESS CONFERENCE WHEN HE HAD TO READ THE WHOLE STATEMENT. THEN HAD TO CORRECT WE HAD MISTAKENLY SAID. FUNNY, THE SAME THING WHEN MUELLER CORRECTED HIMSELF AGAIN. HE WASN’T SAYING HE WOULD CHARGE TRUMP BUT FOR THE OLC POLICY THAT DOESN’T ALLOW THE DEEM IT A SITTING PRESIDENT. RATHER HE MERNT HE DIDN’T MAKE A DECISION WHETHER TRUMP BROKE THE LAW BECAUSE OF THE OLC. REALLY? THEN WHY DID YOU COME TO A CONCLUSION ON COLLUSION? WHY BOTHER IF YOU FELT YOU COULDN’T INDICT EVEN IF YOU FOUND IT? LOOK, I AM GOING TO MAKE THIS EASY FOR YOU. THE DEMOCRATS WERE HOISTED ON THEIR OWN PETARD. THEY SWORE TRUMP WAS A PUPPET AND RUSSIAN AGENT AND THEY RAN WITH IT FOR ALMOST THREE YEARS. THEY MALIGNED AND DESTROYED FAMILIES IN THEIR DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO TAKE OUR PRESIDENT DOWN. THE MAN YOU WOULDN’T TEAR GET BETWEEN HIM AND A CAMERA, ADAM SCHIFF, SWORE HE HAD ACTUAL, SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE OF TRUMP’S COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA THAT WE HAVEN’T SEEN. HOW THIS GUY EVEN SHOWS UP IN PUBLIC LET ALONE REFUSES TO RESIGN AS CHAIR OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE IS STUNNING. HE’S A STONE COLD LIAR. HE HAD NO EVIDENCE, AND HE WAS WILLING TO LIE FOR POLITICAL POWER. HE EVEN SAID MUELLER WOULD BREATHE LIFE INTO THE REPORT. MUELLER NOT ONLY DIDN’T BREATHE LIFE INTO THE REPORT, HE SUCKED THE LIFE OUT LIKE LEMONADE ON A HOT SUMMER DAY AT A DRY RACETRACK. THERE WERE SO MANY FAUX PAS BY MUELLER IT WAS PAINFUL. WHY WE APPLY FOR A 10-YEAR TERM. AND WHEN TRUMP DIDN’T HIRE HIM, ROSENSTEIN APPOINTED HIM SPECIAL COUNSEL. WHY? BECAUSE THE DEEP STATE NEEDED A FRONT. A MAN WITH IMPECCABLE CREDENTIALS. I ALWAYS QUESTIONED HIS ACTIONS AS FBI DIRECTOR DURING THE WHITEY BULGER CASE. BUT THE FBI, COMEY, STRZOK, PAGE AND THE WHOLE LOT OF THEM, THEY NEEDED TO KEEP SOMEONE THERE TO KEEP ANY INVESTIGATION TOIB THEIR PLOT. THEY THINK THEY ARE MORE POWERFUL THAN THE PRESIDENT AND THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. AFTER SEEING MUELLER, WE UNDERSTAND WHY, EVEN THOUGH THE LETTER WAS SENT UNDER MUELLER’S SIGNATURE. ON THE PHONE HE TELLS BARR HE HAD NO PROBLEM WITH IT. IT’S BECAUSE HE DIDN’T WRITE THE LETTER. HIS TRUMP-HATING PIT BULLS DID. WHERE THERE ARE REFERENCES IN THE REPORT OF PEOPLE OF LYING AND NO CHARGES FILED, TAKE A LOOK.>>THE MYSTERIOUS PROFESSOR WHO LIVES IN ROME AND LONDON. HE TELLS PAPADOPOULOS. HE STARTS IT OWL. WHEN THE FBI INTERVIEWS HIM, HE LIES THREE TIMES AND YOU DON’T CHARGE HIM WITH A CRIME.>>I CAN’T GET INTO THAT.>>DID YOU INTERVIEW HIM.>>I CAN’T GET INTO THAT.>>THE GUY WHO PUTS THIS WHOLE STORY IN MOTION, YOU CAN’T CHARGE HIM. JUDGE JEANINE: JIM COMEY, PETER STRZOK, FUSION GPS, HILLARY CLINTON ALL OFF LIMITS. BUT THE REPORT BARELY MENTIONS THEM. FOLKS, YOU AND I KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS REPORT THAN HE DID. THE MAN WASN’T FAMILIAR WITH FUSION GPS, OF HIS OWN TIES TO RUSSIA WHICH HILLARY CLINTON AND THE DNC LAUNDERED MONEY THROUGH TO GIVE TO A FOREIGN AGENT. HOW IS IT POSSIBLE TO LOOK AT RUSSIAN INTEREST FEARS WHICH WAS MUELLER’S CHARGE IF YOU FAILED TO LOOK AT THE STEEL DOSSIER AND THE ROLE OF IT AND THE CORRUPT PLAYERS IN THE FBI AND THE DOJ. THE MAN HADED TEMERITY TO SAY THE DOSSIER WAS OUT OF HIS PURSUE.>>IT’S OUTSIDE MY PURVIEW. WITH REGARD TO THE STEELE — THAT’S BEYOND MY PURVIEW. AS I SAID BEFORE, I’LL SAY AGAIN, IT’S NOT MY PURVIEW. JUDGE JEANINE: HE SAID THINGS WERE BEYOND HIS PURVIEW MORE THAN 10 TIMES AND HE COULD NOT OR WOULD NOT DISCUSS TOPICS ABOUT A HUNDRED TIMES. HE SAID HE DIDN’T KNOW IF CHRISTOPHER STEELE LIED. AND THE ORIGINS OF THE DOSSIER, THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION AND THE WHOLE CAMPAIGN. HOW COULD HE SAY IT’S BEYOND HIS PURVIEW? IT’S IN THE REPORT. WHY WAS HIS WHOLE TEAM COMPRISED OF TRUMP-HATING HILLARY LOVING SYCOPHANTS. HIS ANSWER WAS HE WAS RNLT ALLOWED POLITICAL QUESTIONS. EVEN A PRIVATE LAW FIRM WOULD NOT HIRE SOMEONE SIMPLY ON THE BASIS OF A RESUME UNLESS YOU ALREADY DECIDED YOU WANTED THEM ON YOUR TEAM. PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE LAWYER FOR THE CLINTON FOUNDATION. ANY ONE IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM, ESPECIALLY IN WASHINGTON WOULD KNOW THAT ANDREW WISEMAN KNOW THAT ANDREW WEIEMAN KNOW THAT ANDREW WEISSAN KNOW THAT ANDREW WEISSMANN IS ONE OF THE MOST OF UNETHICAL PROSECUTORS IN THE NATION. EVEN THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT SAID SO. HE HAS A HISTORY OF PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT AND SENDING INNOCENTS TO JAIL. HOW CAN ANYONE BELIEVE HE RANDOMLY SELECTED THE BEST LAWYERS, SO MANY TRUMP HATERS, HILLARY LOVERS AND NOT ACCIDENTALLY GET ONE REPUBLICAN IN THERE IS JUST PLAIN STUPID. DEMOCRATS SAY MUELLER DID NOT EXONERATE THE PRESIDENT. EXONERATE? WHERE THE HELL IS THAT FROM? THAT IS AN ATTEMPT TO MALIGN THE PRESIDENT. I TOLD YOU THIS BEFORE. I DON’T KNOW ONE PROSECUTOR WHO HAS EVER SAID ANYTHING LIKE THAT. YOU EITHER INDICT OR YOU SAY NOTHING. BY SAYING YOU CANNOT EXONERATE MUELLER OR WHOEVER PREPPED HIM UP FOR THIS HEARING IS LEAVING THE PRESIDENT WITH AN ANCHOR AROUND HIS NECK, NOT ALLOWING HIM TO EVEN REBATE THE CLAIM HE’S NOT EXONERATED FROM IS. THIS IS THE DEMOCRATS TURNING LADY JUSTICE ON HER HEAD. REPUBLICANS WE KNOW FROM THE BRETT KAVANAUGH HEARING ARE NOT ENTITLED TO THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE. NOW WE HAVE A TOTALLY NEW FEAR IN OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM WHICH IS A LIMBO THAT CAN NEVER BE RESOLVED SINCE YOU CAN NEVER PLEAD YOUR CASE IN A COURTROOM. THESE RADICALS HAVE TRIED TO REMAKE AMERICA. THEY CONTINUE TO MAKE RULES WE NEVER HEARD OF. THEY DIDN’T INVESTIGATE THE STEELE DOSSIER. OR WHETHER STEELE MADE IT ALL UP. THEY TRIED TO USE THEIR POWER TO OVERTURN AN ELECTION WITH THE MOST OF OUTRAGEOUS ABUSE OF POWER IN AMERICAN POLITICAL HISTORY. MAYBE SOME DAY WE’LL KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT THE ATTEMPTED FRAMING OF THE PRESIDENT. WHY THE FBI AND DOJ OFFICIALS AND MORE IMPORTANTLY, WHETHER THAT PLOT GOES ALL THE WAY TO THE TOP. AS LISA PAGE SAID TO PETER STRZOK OR LOVER ON SEPTEMBER 9, 2016, QUOTE, POTUS WANTS TO KNOW EVERYTHING WE ARE DOING. THAT’S MY OPEN. LET ME KNOW WHAT YOU THINK ON MY FACEBOOK AND TWITTER #judgejeanine. HERE WITH REACTION TO MY OPEN, PRESIDENT TRUMP’S ATTORNEY RUDY GIULIANI. MR. MAYOR, GOOD TO HAVE YOU HERE. THANKS FOR BEING HERE IN STUDIO. I’M NOT GOING TO ASK YOU WHAT YOU THOUGHT OF THE REPORT BECAUSE IT WOULD BE A WASTE OF TIME. THE FIRST QUESTION I’M GOING TO ASK YOU, BASED UPON SOMETHING MATT GATES ASKED THE DIRECTOR. CAN YOU SAY THE STEEL DOSSIER WAS NOT PART OF THE DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN? MUELLER SAID I SAID IN THAT IT OPENING STATEMENT THAT PART OF THE BUILDING OF THE CASE PREDATED BY ME BY AT LEAST 10 MONTHS. HE’S SAYING HE CONTINUES TALK ABOUT THE STEEL DOSSIER. WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU.>>I DON’T UNDERSTAND THE ANSWER. IT’S AN INCOHERENT ANSWER. HOW YOU CANNOT INVESTIGATE THE STEEL DOSSIER AND SAY YOU ARE INVESTIGATING RUSSIAN INTEREST FORCE IN THE 2016 ELECTION IS A COMPLETE CONTRADICTION IT’S NOT A FAWLS FALSE STATEMENT, IT’S NOT A LIE. HE WASN’T MANDATED WITH JUST INVESTIGATING A CASE AGAINST DONALD TRUMP. IT WAS 2016 INTERFERENCE. HILLARY CLINTON INTERFERED THROUGH THE STEEL DOSSIER BECAUSE HE — THE STEELE DOSSIER. THAT ALSO FOREIGN INTERFERENCE. HE IGNORED THAT. WHAT YOU END UP WITH YOU CAN BY PROCESS OF ELIMINATION BY PURVIEW, HE ELIMINATED EVERYTHING EXCEPT FRAMING TRUMP. JUDGE JEANINE: HE WAS VERY GOOD AT IT.>>THINK ABOUT THE LIBERAL PRESS. THERE USED TO BE A DEFENDER OF PEOPLE’S RIGHTS WHEN IT DIDN’T MATTER IF YOU WERE A GOOD GUY OR BAD GUY OR REPUBLICAN OR DEMOCRAT. THIS WORSE THAN McCARTHYISM BECAUSE THERE ARE MORE PEOPLE INVOLVED. DONALD TRUMP HAS BEEN SUBJECTED TO A COMPLETELY NEW AUTHORITARIAN SET OF RULES. THEY CAN’T EVEN WAKE UP AND SEE IT. THE MINUTE I SAW THE WORD EXAM EXONERATE IN THE REPORT, I CAN’T TELL YOU WHAT I SAID. LANGUAGE IS NOT LANGUAGE I CAN REPEAT ON TELEVISION ABOUT THEM. THEY HAVE GIVEN AWAY ALL ETHICS, ALL COMMON SENSE, ANY DEDICATION TO 2,000 YEARS OF LAW. YOU CAN’T PROVE A NEGATIVE. JUDGE JEANINE: YOU EITHER INDICT OR KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT. THEY TURNED JUSTICE UPSIDE DOWN. BUT YOU ARE RIGHT ON THE POINT, ANY LINK TO COORDINATION BETWEEN THE RUSSIAN GOVERNMENT AND INDIVIDUALS ASSOCIATED WITH THE CAMPAIGN AND ANY MATTERS THAT MAY ARISE DIRECTLY FROM THE INVESTIGATION. SINCE THE STEELE DOSSIER WAS BIRTH PACED ON HILLARY CLINTON’S PAYMENT TO PERKINS-COIE, HE HAD AN OBLIGATION TO INVESTIGATE.>>HE NEVER READ HIS MANDATE OR HE KNEW THE MANDATE. JUDGE JEANINE: HE WAS THE SHILL, HE WAS THE BEARD. THEY PICKED HIM BECAUSE HE COULDN’T UNDERSTAND IT.>>WHEN YOU LOOK AT HIM, HE SHOULDN’T BE IN CHARGE OF SOMETHING THIS SERIOUS. HE SHOULDN’T HAVE BEEN THERE. HE SHOULD HAVE HAD ENOUGH SELF-CONTROL TO REALIZE I CAN’T DO THIS ANYMORE. WHY DIDN’T THE PEOPLE OF AROUND HIM COME FORWARD? JUDGE JEANINE: THEY WANTED HIM THERE.>>THEY WHETHER INMATES RUNNING THE ASYLUM.>>THAT’S THE DEEP STATE. IF YOU EVER QUESTION WHETHER THE DEEP STATE EXISTED. YOU JUST SAW HE WAS THE COVER, THE SHILL. LISTEN TO THIS OF NADLER. THE DEMS ARE ALL HYPED UP ABOUT IMPEACHMENT.>>ANYONE ELSE WHO ACTED IN THIS WAY IF THEY WERE NOT THE SITTING PRESIDENT WOULD FACE CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND INDICTMENTS. ONLY THE OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL’S OPINION THAT YOU CAN’T INDICT APPOSITING PRESIDENT IS SAVING THE PRESIDENT FROM INDICTMENT.>>BEFORE WE GO TO QUESTIONS, I WANT TO ADD ONE CORRECTION TO MY TESTIMONY. I WANT TO GO BACK TO ONE THING THAT WAS SAID THIS MORNING BY MR. LIEU. HE SAID YOU DIDN’T CHARGE THE PRESIDENT BECAUSE OF THE OLC OPINION. THAT IS NOT THE CORRECT WAY TO SAY IT. AS WE SAY IN THE REPORT AND I SAID IN THE OPENING. WE DID NOT REACH A DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER THE PRESIDENT COMMITTED A CRIME. JUDGE JEANINE: WHAT MUELLER SAID WAS OLC HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH IT. AND AFTER MUELLER SAID THAT, NADLER IS ANOTHER CORRUPT DEEP STATER. HE COMES OUT AND SAID ANYONE ELSE WOULD HAVE BEEN INDICTED. AND THE OLC PREVERNLTSED THEM FROM INDICTING HIM.>>HE LIED. THIS IS A MAN WHO DECIDED TO IMPEACH HIM TWO YEARS AGO. HE WAS CAUGHT ON THE AMTRAK, HE’S GOT A BIG MOUTH AND SORT OF A SMALL BRAIN. HE WAS SAYING SOMETHING LIKE WE ARE GOING TO INDICT HIM, THIS IS THE SCHEDULE. THIS IS A HANGING JUDGE WHO MADE THE DETERMINATION — BASICALLY NADLER AND SCHIFF. EVEN NADLER MORE THAN SCHIFF — SO WHAT NADLER SAYS BASICALLY IS, YOU KNOW, YOU ARE GUILTY, DOESN’T MATTER WHAT MUELLER SAYS. YOU ARE GUILTY AND NOW WE’LL GIVE YOU HAVE A TRIAL. THAT’S WHY HE SHOULDN’T COOPERATE WITH THE HEARINGS. IT’S AN UNFAIR PROCESS DETERMINED TO NAIL HIM. A GUY LIKE ELIJAH CUMMINGS CAN HAVE COHEN COME IN WHO COMMITTED PERJURY SEVEN TIMES. AND HE HAS THE GAL TO APPEAR AND PONTIFICATE. HE’S SAYING I’M GOING TO NAIL YOU IF YOU LIE. PEOPLE CAN LIE ABOUT DONALD TRUMP AND GET AWAY WITH IT BECAUSE THEY WANT TO RAILROAD HIM. JUDGE JEANINE: THE PRESIDENT DIDN’T FIRE ANYONE. YET NADLER WANTS TO REMOVE THE PRESIDENT FOR OBSTRUCTION WHEN THE PRESIDENT DIDN’T FIRE ANYBODY.>>AND MUELLER SAID I COULDN’T CONCLUDE HE OBSTRUCTED. BUT IT’S CLEAR IN HIS REPORT HE CAN’T FIND EVIDENCE OF OBSTRUCTION. IF ALL THOSE 18 TRUMP-HATING HILLARY LOVING OUT OF CONTROL, UNETHICAL PROSECUTORS, A FEW OF THEM REALLY UNETHICAL. SOME OF THEM ASLEEP, AND ONE REALLY ASLEEP, IF THEY COULDN’T FIND OBSTRUCTION, NADLER IS GOING TO FIND IT? YOU THINK THAT GUY IS A GOOD ENOUGH LAWYER? YOU CAN SEE WHAT HE’S LIKE. JUDGE JEANINE: LET ME TELL YOU WHAT THE SILVER LINING IS. IF IT WEREN’T FOR DONALD TRUMP WE WOULD NEVER KNOW HOW CORRUPT THE DEMOCRATS WERE. WE WOULD NEVER KNOW FOR SURE THERE IS A DEEP STATE. NOW WE KNOW IT.>>THE BIGGEST MISTAKE THEY MAY HAVE MADE IS TO CALL MUELLER WHICH WILL GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF HOW INCOME TENT NADLER AND SCHIFF — IF YOU ARE A LAWYER,