Chinese projects stuck in Nepal due to Prachanda’s Pro-India Policies : Chinese Media
Articles, Blog

Chinese projects stuck in Nepal due to Prachanda’s Pro-India Policies : Chinese Media

August 9, 2019

Welcome to WARN, Todays News is.
Chinese projects stuck in Nepal due to Prachanda’s Pro-India Policies : Chinese Media Ahead of Nepal Premier Prachanda’s fence-mending
visit to China this week, state-run media here has slammed him saying that ties have
fallen to a “low ebb” with most of the Chinese projects stuck due to his “pro-India” policies.
An article in the state-run Global Times said for quite some time Prachanda, the Prime Minister
and the chairman of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist), had been friendly toward China. The article recalled his past close association
with China as well as his anti-India rhetoric. However, since assuming office for the second
time as Prime Minister in August last year he has visited India twice and warmly welcomed
President Pranab Mukherjee in Kathmandu last November, the article noted. “Given Prachanda’s pro-India foreign policy,
the Sino- Nepalese relationship has fallen into low ebb,” it said.
Prachanda, who succeeded ‘pro-China’ Prime Minister K P Sharma Oli, will embark on a
five-day visit to China from March 23 during which he will attend the Boao Forum for Asia
Annual Conference. He is also expected to meet Chinese President
Xi Jinping, who last year skipped Nepal during his South Asia tour, apparently upset over
lack of progress over much-advertised projects like China-Nepal rail linkages and instead
met Prachanda in Goa on the sidelines of the BRICS summit. For China, the fall of the Oli regime was
a big disappointment and a setback to its planned big push into Nepal through Tibet
with rail and highway linkages to expand its influence in the landlocked country which
was dependent on India for all its supplies, according to analysts. Today’s article was critical of Prachanda
for the fall of the Oli government and for failing to push projects.
“It is widely believed in Nepal that Prachanda has toppled the pro-China government led by
Oli under New Delhi’s manipulation and paved the way for the Nepali Congress to build a
pro-India government in the future,” the article said. Prachanda and Sher Bahadur Deuba of the Nepali
Congress “both vowed that they would carry out the deals signed with Beijing during Oli’s
China visit last March, but actions speak louder than words”, the article said.
“Until today, no substantial progress has yet been made,” it said. “Prachanda will transfer his power to Deuba
soon after May 14, when the local-level elections will be held. Even if Prachanda would ink
some vital deals with Beijing, they will most likely face the same fate of those signed
during Oli’s China visit — being suspended by Deuba,” the article stated. However, although the tour takes place towards
the end of his second term as Nepal’s Prime Minister, it is undoubtedly good news for
ties between Beijing and Kathmandu, the article said.
“Nevertheless, in order to win more support for his party in the upcoming local elections
and dispel the accusation of being pro-India, Prachanda might sign some critical agreements
with Beijing this time,” it noted. Among the pacts that he may sign are the construction
of Sino-Nepal railway, upgrading the China-Nepal Araniko Highway and the road linking the Gyirong
Port in China’s Tibet Autonomous Region and Kathmandu as well as a Sino-Nepalese free
trade deal, the article said. “Yet when examining whether a foreign government
or party is friendly to China, implementation of the agreements is more important than signing
the deals,” it said. “Several projects in Nepal involving Chinese
companies, such as Upgrade Kathmandu Ring Road Second Phase Project, the Pokhara International
Airport, the Gautam Buddha International Airport in Lumbini and the West Seti Hydropower Project
have been consistently blocked for various reasons,” it noted. China has every reason to require the Nepalese
government to safeguard the interests of Chinese investors and contractors, the article contended.
The article also said “Beijing, New Delhi and Kathmandu ought to abandon the outdated
zero-sum mindset, set aside their disputes, agree to disagree, start to seek common interests
and strive for prosperity.” “Prachanda’s term is about to come to an end.
A China tour at this point and possible deals with the Chinese side can be a significant
sign of improvement in the bilateral relationship,” it said.
No matter which political party comes to power, China would like to advocate cooperation.
China is always ready to help Nepal to develop its economy and achieve prosperity, the article
said. “Nepal can become another ‘iron friend’ of
China in South Asia,” it said.


  • Reply Abhinav Bansal March 24, 2017 at 4:24 pm

    Prachanda is an intelligent person he is doing the right thing he is choosing the right partner India

  • Reply Raju Gurung March 24, 2017 at 4:49 pm

    sher bahadur murdar verry bed

  • Reply didi oi March 24, 2017 at 5:20 pm


  • Reply didi oi March 24, 2017 at 5:20 pm


  • Reply Mohasa S March 24, 2017 at 11:03 pm

    Nepal needs to look at who benefits in the deals China signs with other countries.  Sri Lanka is having second thoughts about all the benefits that China promised – with Sri Lanka paying for the deals and China reaping the long term benefits.  Check African countries and Pakistan being drowned by debts to China.  And all the work is done by imported Chinese and equipment must be bought from China and they are not the best equipment around.  The hydroelectric plants are not the most efficient because Chinese hardware are not the best.

  • Reply eric mascarenhas March 25, 2017 at 11:31 am

    Prachanda is an intelligent administrator!! If you look at
    China making inroads globally
    to gain huge contracts by giving kickbacks to various foreign governments elite officials, millitary dictators and theirs top brass all over the world.Now are facing problem from Latin Americas
    Africa's, Myanmar, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and various other countries, these contracts has
    been more beneficial to China
    than the host countries which are reeling under heavy debts buying Chinese sub standard
    products will not be able to pay the debt in their lifetime running their countries bankrupt with these bad Chinese deal.

  • Reply Ram Sivaji March 25, 2017 at 12:48 pm

    China exploits situations to create problems in sub continent, while keeping the point in mind and security reasons all countries in subcontinent needs deal with china. China bribes official, to enter agreements, after entering grab rights of those countries cause those countries face bankruptcy, later treat as slaves. Once the country loss its economic independence they remain like slaves or just workers.

  • Reply AIPC March 25, 2017 at 1:04 pm

    first chinese have eaten tibet and now they are looking towards nepal.

  • Reply Frank Mario Alexander March 25, 2017 at 1:31 pm

    China grabbed Tibet first, next country on the list is Nepal. guess what the nepalis cant fight Chinese military so they will accept slavery, and with that nepal will become another new state of China, and anyone who oppose Chinese rule will go Missing forever….. good luck to Nepal for dancing with the devil!!!!

  • Reply Frank Mario Alexander March 25, 2017 at 3:18 pm

    just see what happened to porkistan, now prokis bend over and chinese having good time

  • Reply Tkm March 26, 2017 at 4:34 am

    there isn't any country who is friend of china…..except Pakistan, well North Korea if u call a nation. Chinese cant b friend to anyone, they r da most ruthless, cunning creatures without human rights.

  • Reply Sachin Singh March 26, 2017 at 6:00 pm

    china has supplied arms to maoists since ages……..Maosts kill their own people……china literally buys top politicians and officers and media people to speak against India………there are people who understand it …………..and dont wanna be slaves of communist party , the way chinese are…….

  • Reply Bijay Baruwal April 2, 2017 at 7:51 pm

    need to overthrow this puppets and elect kp oli a pro china neta

  • Reply krishna ghale April 10, 2017 at 2:18 pm

    machikne netaharu

  • Reply Af Kar April 12, 2017 at 5:30 am

    China is a booming economy, the production house of the world economy. Any country that attaches value to friendly relationship with China shall win end of the day….There is no future at all going against China…..

  • Reply Nabajyoti Swargiary April 16, 2017 at 10:58 am

    China helped Sri Lanka once n made them slaves trying to make them work against india, helped Pakistan n made them slaves,they conquered Tibet n tibetians doesn't have rights, they violate human rights every day n sadly media can't go against China to report anything about it, more interestingly Chinese people r themselves the worst sufferers of the Chinese government n let us not forget the massive 1989 democratic movement of China when the communist government massacared their own people with tanks n artillery who were seeking democracy n human rights etc etc. They r claiming all the islands of South China Sea when the world knows it doesnot belong to them n they will not take a second to claim Nepal as their part of territory. When u have Chinese loan and u can't pay back, u have to listen to them wtever they ask for coz u will b burried under loans n ur hands will be tied. So, say "no" to china when u have the right n choice otherwise it will be too late when u will be forced to do things against ur own interests. Don't forget nothing is free in this world n if some one is offering something attractive especially when it comes to coward China then u must try to find the real intentions. 'Development' according to China is where every breath u take is a loan. Rest is your choice Nepalians.

  • Reply yangchen dikki April 17, 2017 at 3:03 am

    Chinese little dick influence disease , becareful Nepal

  • Reply kaushik thaker April 17, 2017 at 7:48 pm

    blood is thicker than water ,because napali are brothers first

  • Reply B.Phar. Serv. April 18, 2017 at 4:38 am

    Fake Indian propaganda channel.

  • Reply Devashis Shrestha April 19, 2017 at 12:50 pm

    stupid guy, all we need is good infrastructure, why be scared of some policy ..

  • Reply Devashis Shrestha April 19, 2017 at 12:55 pm

    hope we can get in those chinese trains to end indian monopoly of trade in Nepal

  • Reply Sushil Ahuja April 23, 2017 at 7:12 am

    nokri bhi China se lo

  • Reply Sushil Ahuja April 23, 2017 at 7:13 am

    Nepal India ke against chaal chall raha hai aur dabav bana raha hai

  • Reply Sumanta Sen April 24, 2017 at 7:59 am

    PRACHANDA is quite intelligent , simply because the ancient super power incredible INDIA is much more believable than that of greedy CHINA — ONCE BELIEVE GRADUALLY ON THE WANE — Nepal chooses the right path

  • Reply omnamaha 052 April 26, 2017 at 2:43 am

    China will damage Hinduism and culture in Nepal…….

  • Reply vk April 28, 2017 at 2:53 am

    China claims nepal's mountains and tarai region. they are planning to take control on everything by creating debt on nepal and slowly create more debt on nepal.sp, they can be forced to accept china's policies and can be forced to give up chinese claimed land in exchange of debt. Nepal should be careful. China grabed the Land in srilanka by investing on hambantota port and forced srilankan gov. to give that port to china for 99 years on lease. China created huge debt on pakistan so, that they can make slave to them. china knows small economy like pakistan who already warned by World bank for economic collapse due to debt.china is imposing more debt on them and taking control over pakistan in the name of development. Pakistan will not be able to pay their money of 56bn$ in near 50 years if pakistan's economic growth comes on track which looks difficult due pakistan's terrorism sponsorship policies and terrorists training centers funded by gov.a nd trained by pka army. Nepal should be aware about chinese policies.

  • Reply GK April 30, 2017 at 4:36 am

    China is a Crook State,… which Occupied TIBET, Xinjiang & other provinces …Now planning to Occupy Nepal, Pakistan ( already in deep trouble..) , Sri Lanka,….

  • Reply R model imges May 5, 2017 at 7:50 pm

    India trying to big game with Nepal all's Nepali or Nepal not happy with modi Sarakr or he is policy hate modi fuck Modi fuck madhshi

  • Reply BAnand May 7, 2017 at 6:40 am

    Nepali brothers pls careful with china they will take control your country. pls sack Chinese, china is your enemy.

  • Reply Vikash Subba May 10, 2017 at 7:04 am

    India doesn't want to see Nepal being process and thanks to the coward leaders of Nepal for helping India to doing so…Jai Nepal

  • Reply बुढाथोकी धन May 14, 2017 at 7:02 pm

    #राजा_बीरेन्द्रको_शान्तिक्षेत्रको_प्रस्तावलाई_किन_र_कसरी_भारतले_असफल_बनायो ?

    《नेपाल भारतीय उपमहाद्वीपको अंग होइन भन्ने राजा बीरेन्द्रको शान्तिक्षेत्रको प्रस्तावको सान्दर्भिकता कत्ति पनि घटेको छैन》

    — गोपाल खनाल

    राजा वीरेन्द्रले २०३१ फागुन १३ (२५ फेब्रुअरी १९७५) मा आनो शुभराज्याभिषेक समारोहमा सहभागी ३९ राष्ट्रका प्रतिनिधिसमक्ष ‘नेपाललाई शान्तिक्षेत्र घोषणा गरियोस्’ भन्ने प्रस्ताव राखे । चीन र पाकिस्तानले तत्कालै नेपालको प्रस्ताव स्वीकृत गरे, भारतले गरेन । वीरेन्द्रको उक्त प्रस्तावलाई सर्वप्रथम सोभियत संघले समर्थन गरेको थियो तर भारतले विरोध गरेपछि फिर्ता लियो र उत्तर कोरिया शान्तिक्षेत्र प्रस्तावको समर्थन गर्ने पहिलो राष्ट्र बन्यो ।

    भारतले शान्तिक्षेत्र प्रस्तावप्रति सुरूदेखि नै नकारात्मक दृष्टिकोण राख्यो । वीरेन्द्रको यो प्रस्ताव अकस्मात् आएको भने थिएन । त्यसअघि सेप्टेम्बर १९७३ मा अल्जियर्समा भएको असंलग्न राष्ट्रहरुको शिखर सम्मेलन (नाम समिट) मा उनले नेपाल र छिमेकबीच शान्ति र सहयोगको नीतिलाई औपचारिक बनाउने प्रयास गरेका थिए । त्यस क्रममा उनले शान्तिक्षेत्रको प्रस्तावको अवधारणासमेत राखेका थिए । उनले त्यस बेला भनेका थिए, ‘दुई ठूला जनसंख्या भएका देशको बीचमा अवस्थित नेपाललाई उनीहरुको शान्तिको खामले ढाकोस् ।’

    त्यसरी अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय मञ्चमा शान्तिक्षेत्रको अवधारणा अघि सारेकोे दुई वर्षपछि राज्याभिषेक समारोहमा राजा वीरेन्द्रले उक्त प्रस्ताव राखेका थिए । त्यस बेला उनले युगोस्लाभ समाचार समिति तान्जुङलाई अन्तर्वार्ता दिँदै ‘नेपालको कुनै पनि शत्रु नभएकाले शान्तिक्षेत्रको प्रस्ताव कतैबाट पनि त्रास वा धम्कीको सामना गर्नुपर्ला भनेर राखिएको होइन’ भन्ने स्पष्ट पारे । प्रस्तावमा शान्ति र विकासप्रति नेपालको अभिरूचि तथा शान्ति र विकासको अन्योन्याश्रित सम्बन्धबारे नेपालको अनुभूति प्रतिबिम्बित भएको हो भने । ‘एसियाको सबैभन्दा पुरानो सभ्यताको विरासत बोकेको हैसियतमा हाम्रो स्वाभाविक चासो हाम्रो स्वतन्त्रताको संरक्षण हो, इतिहासले हामीलाई दिएको लिगेसी हो । हामीलाई हाम्रो सुरक्षाका लागि, स्वतन्त्रताका लागि र विकासका लागि शान्ति चाहिएको छ । शान्ति हाम्रो बढ्दो चासो हो किनभने हाम्रा नागरिक वास्तवमै शान्ति चाहन्छन् । शान्तिलाई संस्थागत गर्ने त्यही चाहनाअन्तर्गत म मेरो देशलाई शान्तिक्षेत्र घोषणा गरियोस् भन्ने प्रस्ताव राख्छु’ प्रस्ताव राख्दै उनले भनेका थिए ।

    शक्तिशाली छिमेकीका द्वन्द्वबाट नेपाललाई बचाउन उनले यो प्रस्ताव ल्याएका थिए । यो प्रस्ताव स्वीकृत भएपछि नेपालमा सैन्य बलको प्रयोगजस्ता मुद्दामा अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय प्रतिबन्ध लाग्थ्यो । प्रस्ताव पूर्णतः नेपाली सुरक्षा र स्वार्थ संरक्षण अनुकूल थियो ।

    तर छिमेकी भारतले भने सन् १९५० को सन्धिविपरीत रहेको ठानेर यसलाई अनुमोदन गरेन, जबकि विश्वका ११६ देशले समर्थन गरे । पूर्वप्रधानमन्त्री मरिचमानसिंह श्रेष्ठले भनेका थिए, ‘भारतीयहरुले शान्तिक्षेत्रको प्रस्तावलाई सन् १९५० को सन्धिको विपरीत भने । त्यसबाहेक उनीहरुसँग अर्को कुनै तर्क थिएन । हामीले भन्यौं, सन्धिको पालना त भारतले पनि गरेको छैन । यति हुँदा पनि संसारका शक्तिशाली मुलुकहरुसहित अधिकांशले नेपालको प्रस्तावको समर्थन गरिसकेका थिए ।’

    भारतलाई समर्थन गरी शान्तिक्षेत्र प्रस्ताव अनुमोदन नगर्ने दोस्रो राष्ट्रमा सोभियत संघ पर्‍यो । किनकि त्यस बेला भारत र सोभियत संघबीच रणनीतिक साझेदारीको सम्झौता भएको थियो, जसभित्र द्विपक्षीय मामिला मात्र नभएर अन्तर्राष्ट्रिय मामिलासमेत सन्निहित थियो । भारतीय कदमलाई उसले पछ्याउनुको कारण यही थियो ।

    पूर्वप्रधानमन्त्री कीर्तिनिधि बिष्टका अनुसार, बदलिँदो विश्वको राजनीतिक परिवेशलाई बुझी नेपाललाई शान्तिक्षेत्र बनाउन अघि सारिएको प्रस्ताव नेपालको सक्रिय असंलग्न तथा तटस्थ परराष्ट्र नीतिमा थप्न खोजिएको नयाँ आयाम थियो । उनी भन्छन्, ‘२०४६ सालमा समर्थन गर्ने राष्ट्रको संख्या १२० पुगेको थियो । वास्तवमा भन्ने हो भने आज पनि यसको सान्दर्भिकता कत्ति पनि घटेको छैन ।’
    यसैबीच सिक्किमलाई भारतमा विलय गराइएको अवस्थामा सिक्किमका अपदस्थ शासकको सम्भावित नेपाल बसाइप्रति पनि भारत सतर्क रहेको कुरा सार्वजनिक भयो । शान्तिक्षेत्र प्रस्तावको गम्भीर महङ्खव भएको र आना शत्रुराष्ट्र चीन तथा पाकिस्तानले तत्कालै समर्थन गरेकाले रणनीतिक महङ्खव ठानी भारतले कहिल्यै पनि नेपालको प्रस्ताव स्वीकार गरेन ।

    भारतले विगतका सन्धिलाई आधार मानी यसलाई स्विकार्न नसकिने बताएको थियो । नेपालको प्रस्ताव भारतीयविरूद्ध लक्षित नभएको र भारतले समर्थन गर्नुपर्छ भन्नेमा नेपालले आश्वस्त पार्न सकेको देखिएन । नेपाली कूटनीतिक इतिहासमा यसलाई नेपालको ठूलो कमजोरी मान्नुपर्ने हुन्छ । विश्वका सबैजसो देशले समर्थन गरे पनि तीनतिरबाट सीमा जोडिएको छिमेकीले समर्थन नगरेपछि नेपालको प्रस्ताव त्यत्तिकै तुहियो ।

    शान्तिक्षेत्रको प्रस्तावबारे भारतको असहमतिप्रति असन्तुष्टि व्यक्त गर्दै नेपालले त्यसलाई दुःखलाग्दो विषय ठहर गर्‍यो ।
    नेपाल सरकारका तर्फबाट संयुक्त राष्ट्रसंघका महासचिव कुर्तवाल्द हाइमसँग औपचारिक बैठक हुँदा छिमेकी मुलुक भारतले मान्यता नदिई यसको औचित्य नहुने र यसलाई राष्ट्रसंघमा प्रस्तुत गर्न नसकिने धारणा आएपछि नेपाल भारतप्रति झन् असन्तुष्ट भयो । भारतले त्यस असन्तुष्टिको उपेक्षा मात्र गरेन, सन् १९७५ यता नेपाल भ्रमणमा आएका भारतीय प्रधानमन्त्रीलगायत शीर्ष नेताहरुले नेपालको भारतसँग विशेष सम्बन्ध रहेको र त्यो अन्य देशसँग तुलना गर्न नमिल्ने वक्तव्य दिन थाले । भारतका तर्फबाट सन् १९५० को सन्धिको सार्थकताबारे उल्लेख हुन थाल्यो, जबकि त्यस बेला त्यसबारे बहसै सुरू भएको थिएन ।

    भारतले राजा वीरेन्द्रको प्रस्तावलाई अस्वीकार गर्नुको अर्को उल्लेखनीय कारण प्रसिद्ध पत्रिका न्युजविकलाई उनले दिएको अन्तर्वार्ताको भारतीय प्रसंगसमेत थियो ।
    १० सेप्टेम्बर १९७३ को अंकमा छापिएको सो अन्तर्वार्तामा वीरेन्द्रले नेपाल भारतीय उप

  • Reply बुढाथोकी धन May 14, 2017 at 7:04 pm

    india always role for crocodile friends for nepal so plz worldwide show how blocked and killing Nepal this morden age but our visionary pm kp oli open new world for nepal thanks oli live long we never forgot you…

  • Reply Gulung Gulung May 20, 2017 at 6:48 pm

    all nepal political party minister are not well educated bcozz of it we facing problem at nepal

  • Reply RGZ May 25, 2017 at 7:53 pm

    pls keep the audio level of intro and the video at similar level … thank you!

  • Reply omnamaha 052 June 25, 2017 at 10:02 am

    after OBOR project is finish, china will build factories to cover the world demands, Sri lanka, Bangladesh, Nepal and few other countries so Pakistan will work for China, and China will collect the tax……so like Britain than to India

    God bless and protect you from evil.

  • Reply Kanxa Subba July 15, 2017 at 2:54 pm

    We want China Development in Nepal

  • Reply Ali Hammad Shah August 1, 2017 at 10:28 am

    Nepal should follow its interests without giving a fuck about India. Nepal should build balanced foreign policy so that if any side tries acting too big for its boots, nepal can align with the other.

  • Reply Anu Bansode August 12, 2017 at 8:15 pm

    Jab china inhe debt me dalega na… tab inhe india ki yaad aayegi.. 1 nhi bahot e.g hai .. pak,kazakistan,sri lanka, myanmar…..politicians chose correct path..

  • Reply kalsang phuntsok August 16, 2017 at 7:22 pm

    One day Nepal ll regrat of letting ccp railway to Nepal.. second Tibet ll soon b nepal

  • Reply B C Patil August 26, 2017 at 2:20 pm

    nepali coming to india ,for jobs. u can go and work in china then u will getting some ideas, why western countries like usa ,uk hate china. u don't know anything about china .china exporting everything importing nothing it harms long time

  • Reply yam panta September 22, 2017 at 12:36 pm

    Good fast

  • Reply Ram Rai November 8, 2017 at 10:14 pm

    Welcome to chaina every side project invest we are happy Nepal people.

  • Reply Nepalese song from shillong November 23, 2017 at 3:33 am

    Prachanda should be eliminated why he is doing sala corrupted..minister jataaa..

  • Reply Nepalese song from shillong November 24, 2017 at 12:24 am

    Wht Indians have done for Nepal they just want to rule u Nepal prachanda is clever and corrupted person ….Back off India …

  • Reply florencia 13 December 5, 2017 at 3:22 pm

    The problem of nepal is india.

  • Reply yangchong ghale yangchong ghale December 6, 2017 at 8:07 pm

    Nice China Nepal

  • Reply Hammad Abbasi December 31, 2017 at 11:42 pm

    I am a Pakistani and I would like to advise my Nepali friends. India itself is a hungry country, and what India,s competition with future super power China? India's economy is not even 20 percent of China's economy.
    Nepal, which has been relying on India for the last many decades,In return, Nepal did not get anything other than backwardness.

  • Reply Safia Begum January 31, 2018 at 2:01 pm

    Prachanda must ne a rapist himself to warm up to rape-in-india! Lol

  • Reply Tiger Columbus February 8, 2018 at 7:38 am

    the crooked chinese will screw up the stupid nepalese through and through

  • Reply Simon Y May 30, 2018 at 3:37 pm

    Don’t publish lies you shit eater indiots

  • Reply Sudhendu Gupte July 13, 2018 at 9:32 am

    Nepal have understood the debt trap setup for Nepal and they want out of it and put China in the dock and hang them to dry. So China has failed in Nepal too.

  • Reply Thondup Andrugtsang September 24, 2018 at 2:55 am

    Making a deal with China has a bad ending. Look at other countries now regretting it.

  • Reply hind rakhwale November 14, 2018 at 9:58 am

    When earth quick coming in Nepal Indian army help you forgot

  • Reply Nathan Sekhar April 5, 2019 at 4:41 am

    Most of India’s neighbours moved to People’s Rep of China thinking they would get a better deal for themselves. They played the big powers one against the other to get a better deal for themselves in the process burning their bridges. As in the case of Srilanka where had to cede the Port.
    Of Hambantota. Nepal like Pakistan has got stuck with incomplete Chinese projects. Nathan Sekhar Sydney, Australia.

  • Leave a Reply